PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APFPX vs. SCFZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

APFPX vs. SCFZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund (APFPX) and PGIM Securitized Credit Fund (SCFZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

APFPX vs. SCFZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
APFPX
Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund
4.02%10.21%11.33%6.67%6.73%
SCFZX
PGIM Securitized Credit Fund
0.60%5.75%9.41%8.67%1.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APFPX achieves a 4.02% return, which is significantly higher than SCFZX's 0.60% return.


APFPX

1D
0.15%
1M
0.15%
YTD
4.02%
6M
7.27%
1Y
12.99%
3Y*
9.99%
5Y*
10Y*

SCFZX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.31%
YTD
0.60%
6M
2.11%
1Y
5.31%
3Y*
7.45%
5Y*
5.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


APFPX vs. SCFZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

APFPX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than SCFZX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

APFPX vs. SCFZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APFPX
APFPX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
APFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
APFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
APFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
APFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

SCFZX
SCFZX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
SCFZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCFZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCFZX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SCFZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCFZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APFPX vs. SCFZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund (APFPX) and PGIM Securitized Credit Fund (SCFZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APFPXSCFZXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

5.02

3.52

+1.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

7.27

9.84

-2.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.27

3.61

-1.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.23

6.24

-0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

30.52

25.35

+5.17

APFPX vs. SCFZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APFPX Sharpe Ratio is 5.02, which is higher than the SCFZX Sharpe Ratio of 3.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APFPX and SCFZX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APFPXSCFZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.02

3.52

+1.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.73

1.31

+2.41

Correlation

The correlation between APFPX and SCFZX is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

APFPX vs. SCFZX - Dividend Comparison

APFPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, more than SCFZX's 4.75% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
APFPX
Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund
4.92%4.01%6.18%6.89%8.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCFZX
PGIM Securitized Credit Fund
4.75%5.25%6.55%5.58%4.97%2.56%3.08%2.43%

Drawdowns

APFPX vs. SCFZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APFPX drawdown since its inception was -2.10%, smaller than the maximum SCFZX drawdown of -17.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APFPX and SCFZX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


APFPXSCFZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.10%

-17.20%

+15.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.73%

-0.93%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.31%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.25%

-1.09%

+0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.41%

0.23%

+0.18%

Volatility

APFPX vs. SCFZX - Volatility Comparison

Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund (APFPX) has a higher volatility of 1.24% compared to PGIM Securitized Credit Fund (SCFZX) at 0.22%. This indicates that APFPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCFZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


APFPXSCFZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.24%

0.22%

+1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.86%

1.03%

+0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64%

1.65%

+0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.75%

1.90%

+0.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.75%

3.38%

-0.63%