APEX.L vs. PADV.L
APEX.L (Lyxor MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan UCITS ETF - Acc) and PADV.L (SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - APEX.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD while PADV.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, APEX.L returned 8.31%/yr vs 4.23%/yr for PADV.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. APEX.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PADV.L.
Performance
APEX.L vs. PADV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
APEX.L is traded in USD, while PADV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the PADV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APEX.L achieves a 30.37% return, which is significantly higher than PADV.L's 4.00% return.
APEX.L
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- 10.48%
- YTD
- 30.37%
- 6M
- 33.80%
- 1Y
- 59.06%
- 3Y*
- 25.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- —
PADV.L
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 4.00%
- 6M
- 3.06%
- 1Y
- 13.08%
- 3Y*
- 13.51%
- 5Y*
- 4.23%
- 10Y*
- 7.04%
APEX.L vs. PADV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APEX.L Lyxor MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan UCITS ETF - Acc | 30.37% | 32.38% | 11.51% | 4.94% | -18.85% | -3.67% | 0.79% |
PADV.L SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS | 4.00% | 23.25% | 4.82% | 15.37% | -16.05% | 2.50% | 2.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between APEX.L and PADV.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2020 | 0.55 |
The correlation between APEX.L and PADV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.67 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
APEX.L vs. PADV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
APEX.L
PADV.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
APEX.L
PADV.L
Financial Services
APEX.L
PADV.L
Consumer Cyclical
APEX.L
PADV.L
Industrials
APEX.L
PADV.L
Communication Services
APEX.L
PADV.L
Basic Materials
APEX.L
PADV.L
Healthcare
APEX.L
PADV.L
Energy
APEX.L
PADV.L
-
Consumer Defensive
APEX.L
PADV.L
Utilities
APEX.L
PADV.L
Real Estate
APEX.L
PADV.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APEX.L vs. PADV.L — Risk / Return Rank
APEX.L
PADV.L
APEX.L vs. PADV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan UCITS ETF - Acc (APEX.L) and SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (PADV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APEX.L | PADV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.18 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.57 | 1.57 | +3.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.66 | 4.31 | +12.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APEX.L | PADV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.97 | 1.04 | +1.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.28 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.35 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
APEX.L vs. PADV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APEX.L drawdown since its inception was -43.98%, which is greater than PADV.L's maximum drawdown of -35.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APEX.L and PADV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APEX.L | PADV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.98% | -35.53% | -8.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.85% | -8.27% | -4.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.72% | -14.40% | -4.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.58% | -35.53% | -4.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.10% | -4.69% | +3.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.18% | -8.37% | -12.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 3.02% | +0.51% |
Volatility
APEX.L vs. PADV.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan UCITS ETF - Acc (APEX.L) has a higher volatility of 8.24% compared to SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (PADV.L) at 4.08%. This indicates that APEX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PADV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APEX.L | PADV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.24% | 4.08% | +4.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.85% | 9.88% | +6.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.80% | 12.47% | +7.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.00% | 15.37% | +4.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.68% | 15.95% | +4.73% |
APEX.L vs. PADV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
APEX.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PADV.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
APEX.L vs. PADV.L - Dividend Comparison
APEX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PADV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APEX.L Lyxor MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan UCITS ETF - Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PADV.L SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS | 2.87% | 2.96% | 3.06% | 2.93% | 3.44% | 2.91% | 2.94% | 2.79% | 2.38% | 1.76% | 2.14% | 3.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
APEX.L and PADV.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, APEX.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
APEX.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PADV.L.
APEX.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while PADV.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for APEX.L and 0.55% for PADV.L.
Find the right allocation for APEX.L and PADV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer