APCB vs. VPLS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

APCB (ActivePassive Core Bond ETF) and VPLS (Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, APCB returned 4.82% vs 5.44% for VPLS. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. APCB charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for VPLS.

Performance

APCB vs. VPLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APCB achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly lower than VPLS's 0.74% return.

APCB

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 0.29%
• 6M: 0.29%
• 1Y: 4.82%
• 3Y*: 3.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VPLS

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 0.74%
• 6M: 0.83%
• 1Y: 5.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APCB vs. VPLS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
APCB ActivePassive Core Bond ETF	0.29%	6.87%	1.45%	2.01%
VPLS Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF	0.74%	7.86%	2.72%	2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between APCB and VPLS is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2023	0.94

The correlation between APCB and VPLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

APCB vs. VPLS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	APCB	VPLS
Technology	100.0%	0.1%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	0.0%
Financial Services	-	0.9%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	0.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

APCB vs. VPLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APCB

APCB Risk / Return Rank: 39
APCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
APCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
APCB Omega Ratio Rank: 39
APCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
APCB Martin Ratio Rank: 37

VPLS

VPLS Risk / Return Rank: 43
VPLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
VPLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
VPLS Omega Ratio Rank: 43
VPLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
VPLS Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APCB vs. VPLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	APCB	VPLS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	1.51	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	2.23	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.27	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.87	2.01	-0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.64	6.52	-0.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

APCB vs. VPLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APCB Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the VPLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APCB and VPLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	APCB	VPLS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.41	1.51	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	1.24	-0.56

Drawdowns

APCB vs. VPLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APCB drawdown since its inception was -6.42%, which is greater than VPLS's maximum drawdown of -4.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APCB and VPLS.

Drawdown Indicators

	APCB	VPLS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.42%	-4.17%	-2.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.58%	-2.72%	+0.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.41%	-1.11%	-0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.51%	-1.01%	-0.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.86%	0.84%	+0.02%

Volatility

APCB vs. VPLS - Volatility Comparison

ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS) have volatilities of 1.22% and 1.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APCB	VPLS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.22%	1.26%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.42%	2.69%	-0.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.43%	3.65%	-0.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.84%	4.61%	+0.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.84%	4.61%	+0.23%

APCB vs. VPLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

APCB has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than VPLS's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

APCB vs. VPLS - Dividend Comparison

APCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, less than VPLS's 4.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
APCB ActivePassive Core Bond ETF	4.35%	4.35%	4.74%	2.22%
VPLS Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF	4.76%	4.78%	4.52%	0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both APCB and VPLS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, APCB and VPLS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, APCB or VPLS?

VPLS has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to APCB (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APCB dropped -6.42% vs VPLS's -4.17%.

Which ETF is better, APCB or VPLS?

On 1-year performance, VPLS leads with 5.44% vs 4.82% for APCB. On fees, VPLS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, APCB or VPLS?

Over the 1-year period, VPLS has performed better with a 5.44% return vs 4.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, APCB or VPLS?

VPLS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for APCB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, APCB or VPLS?

VPLS has the higher dividend yield at 4.76%, compared with 4.35% for APCB.

What is the main difference between APCB and VPLS?

They also come from different issuers: ActivePassive and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for APCB and 0.20% for VPLS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VPLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.