PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APBDX vs. PDBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APBDX vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cavanal Hill Bond Fund (APBDX) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APBDX achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 36.23% return. Over the past 10 years, APBDX has underperformed PDBC with an annualized return of 1.12%, while PDBC has yielded a comparatively higher 8.79% annualized return.


APBDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.45%
YTD
0.30%
6M
0.26%
1Y
4.89%
3Y*
3.76%
5Y*
-0.13%
10Y*
1.12%

PDBC

1D
0.39%
1M
-3.37%
YTD
36.23%
6M
36.27%
1Y
45.46%
3Y*
14.42%
5Y*
12.39%
10Y*
8.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APBDX vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
APBDX
Cavanal Hill Bond Fund
0.30%6.49%1.90%5.47%-13.46%-1.57%6.67%7.17%0.02%2.18%
PDBC
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
36.23%5.96%2.09%-6.25%19.23%41.72%-7.84%11.44%-12.78%5.06%

Correlation

The correlation between APBDX and PDBC is -0.36, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2014

-0.15

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between APBDX and PDBC has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.15 to -0.36, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APBDX vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APBDX
APBDX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
APBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
APBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
APBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
APBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

PDBC
PDBC Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PDBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDBC Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PDBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDBC Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APBDX vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cavanal Hill Bond Fund (APBDX) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APBDXPDBCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.43

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

6.35

-4.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.11

13.39

-8.27

APBDX vs. PDBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APBDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the PDBC Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APBDX and PDBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APBDXPDBCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

2.46

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

0.65

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.50

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.23

+0.78

Drawdowns

APBDX vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APBDX drawdown since its inception was -18.21%, smaller than the maximum PDBC drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APBDX and PDBC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APBDXPDBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.21%

-49.52%

+31.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.83%

-7.19%

+4.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.81%

-13.95%

+8.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.21%

-27.63%

+9.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.21%

-40.73%

+22.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.26%

-4.55%

+2.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.58%

-23.21%

+20.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

3.41%

-2.45%

Volatility

APBDX vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cavanal Hill Bond Fund (APBDX) is 1.28%, while Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that APBDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APBDXPDBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

6.20%

-4.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.67%

15.78%

-13.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.92%

18.61%

-14.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.73%

19.12%

-13.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.73%

17.78%

-13.05%

APBDX vs. PDBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

APBDX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than PDBC's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

APBDX vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison

APBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, more than PDBC's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APBDX
Cavanal Hill Bond Fund
3.73%3.54%3.45%2.65%2.41%1.85%1.79%2.24%2.16%1.62%1.97%1.79%
PDBC
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
2.82%3.84%4.42%4.21%13.05%50.83%0.01%1.40%1.00%3.83%6.51%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


APBDX and PDBC have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDBC has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to APBDX (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APBDX dropped -18.21% vs PDBC's -49.52%.

PDBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APBDX and PDBC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer