PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APBDX vs. BIMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APBDX vs. BIMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cavanal Hill Bond Fund (APBDX) and Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional (BIMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APBDX achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly higher than BIMIX's -0.15% return. Over the past 10 years, APBDX has underperformed BIMIX with an annualized return of 1.11%, while BIMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.14% annualized return.


APBDX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.18%
6M
0.38%
1Y
4.15%
3Y*
3.72%
5Y*
-0.19%
10Y*
1.11%

BIMIX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
-0.15%
6M
0.05%
1Y
3.55%
3Y*
4.51%
5Y*
1.16%
10Y*
2.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APBDX vs. BIMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
APBDX
Cavanal Hill Bond Fund
0.18%6.49%1.90%5.47%-13.46%-1.57%6.67%7.17%0.02%2.18%
BIMIX
Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional
-0.15%6.69%3.45%5.78%-8.64%-1.41%7.42%7.05%0.58%2.74%

Correlation

The correlation between APBDX and BIMIX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2000

0.85

The correlation between APBDX and BIMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APBDX vs. BIMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APBDX
APBDX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
APBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
APBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
APBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
APBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

BIMIX
BIMIX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BIMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BIMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APBDX vs. BIMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cavanal Hill Bond Fund (APBDX) and Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional (BIMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APBDXBIMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.29

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

1.87

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.96

5.39

-0.43

APBDX vs. BIMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APBDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the BIMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APBDX and BIMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APBDXBIMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

1.55

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.30

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.66

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

1.17

-0.16

Drawdowns

APBDX vs. BIMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APBDX drawdown since its inception was -18.21%, which is greater than BIMIX's maximum drawdown of -12.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APBDX and BIMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APBDXBIMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.21%

-12.76%

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.83%

-2.07%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.81%

-2.44%

-3.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.21%

-12.76%

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.21%

-12.76%

-5.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.38%

-1.42%

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.58%

-1.48%

-1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

0.71%

+0.26%

Volatility

APBDX vs. BIMIX - Volatility Comparison

Cavanal Hill Bond Fund (APBDX) has a higher volatility of 1.23% compared to Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional (BIMIX) at 0.74%. This indicates that APBDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APBDXBIMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

0.74%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.67%

1.71%

+0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.92%

2.49%

+1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.73%

3.88%

+1.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.73%

3.25%

+1.48%

APBDX vs. BIMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

APBDX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than BIMIX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

APBDX vs. BIMIX - Dividend Comparison

APBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, which matches BIMIX's 3.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APBDX
Cavanal Hill Bond Fund
3.74%3.54%3.45%2.65%2.41%1.85%1.79%2.24%2.16%1.62%1.97%1.79%
BIMIX
Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional
3.72%3.67%3.89%3.21%2.17%2.27%3.49%2.52%2.50%2.35%2.21%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


APBDX and BIMIX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APBDX has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to BIMIX (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APBDX dropped -18.21% vs BIMIX's -12.76%.

BIMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APBDX and BIMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer