PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AOTIX vs. RLEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AOTIX vs. RLEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (AOTIX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio Class R6 (RLEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AOTIX having a 24.14% return and RLEMX slightly lower at 24.08%. Over the past 10 years, AOTIX has underperformed RLEMX with an annualized return of 9.36%, while RLEMX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.84% annualized return.


AOTIX

1D
4.06%
1M
-3.61%
6M
11.12%
YTD
24.14%
1Y
46.83%
3Y*
19.94%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*
9.36%
ALL TIME*
9.36%

RLEMX

1D
2.12%
1M
2.22%
6M
13.36%
YTD
24.08%
1Y
46.85%
3Y*
25.12%
5Y*
14.34%
10Y*
9.84%
ALL TIME*
11.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

AOTIX vs. RLEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AOTIX
Virtus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
24.14%29.73%5.44%17.83%-22.10%-0.26%20.78%17.66%-16.62%38.37%
RLEMX
Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio Class R6
24.08%41.38%7.60%22.42%-14.86%5.43%-0.02%17.99%-18.11%28.02%

Correlation

The correlation between AOTIX and RLEMX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.86

The correlation between AOTIX and RLEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AOTIX vs. RLEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AOTIX
AOTIX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
AOTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
AOTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

RLEMX
RLEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
RLEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
RLEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AOTIX vs. RLEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (AOTIX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio Class R6 (RLEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AOTIXRLEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.52

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

4.18

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.98

14.19

-4.20

AOTIX vs. RLEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOTIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is lower than the RLEMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOTIX and RLEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AOTIX vs. RLEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOTIX drawdown since its inception was -68.42%, which is greater than RLEMX's maximum drawdown of -44.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOTIX and RLEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AOTIXRLEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.42%

-44.12%

-24.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.92%

-10.41%

-3.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.76%

-14.25%

-3.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.86%

-29.17%

-5.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.05%

-44.12%

+6.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.43%

-2.25%

-8.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.57%

-10.36%

-8.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.42%

3.07%

+1.35%

Volatility

AOTIX vs. RLEMX - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (AOTIX) has a higher volatility of 8.80% compared to Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio Class R6 (RLEMX) at 5.13%. This indicates that AOTIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AOTIXRLEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.80%

5.13%

+3.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.11%

12.94%

+7.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.33%

14.84%

+7.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.33%

14.60%

+2.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.84%

16.39%

+1.45%

AOTIX vs. RLEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOTIX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than RLEMX's 1.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

AOTIX vs. RLEMX - Dividend Comparison

AOTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than RLEMX's 1.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOTIX
Virtus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
2.68%3.33%6.13%3.48%3.15%1.94%1.40%2.37%2.81%1.60%1.91%1.10%
RLEMX
Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio Class R6
1.65%2.05%3.10%3.76%5.92%4.89%2.11%2.45%2.10%1.99%1.48%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AOTIX and RLEMX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AOTIX has higher volatility (8.80%) compared to RLEMX (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOTIX dropped -68.42% vs RLEMX's -44.12%.

RLEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AOTIX and RLEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer