AOTG vs. TSXU
AOTG (AOT Growth and Innovation ETF) and TSXU (Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - AOTG is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by AOT, while TSXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). AOTG is actively managed, while TSXU is passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AOTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSXU.
Performance
AOTG vs. TSXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOTG achieves a 10.18% return, which is significantly lower than TSXU's 86.53% return.
AOTG
- 1D
- -3.26%
- 1M
- -2.22%
- 6M
- 10.76%
- YTD
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- 21.05%
- 3Y*
- 23.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSXU
- 1D
- -8.45%
- 1M
- -10.51%
- 6M
- 60.40%
- YTD
- 86.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AOTG vs. TSXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AOTG AOT Growth and Innovation ETF | 10.18% | 2.11% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 86.53% | 37.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between AOTG and TSXU is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AOTG vs. TSXU — Risk / Return Rank
AOTG
TSXU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AOTG vs. TSXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) and Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares (TSXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AOTG | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.58 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AOTG vs. TSXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.63%, smaller than the maximum TSXU drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOTG and TSXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOTG | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.63% | -35.62% | +3.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.80% | -24.58% | +16.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.82% | -10.99% | +3.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.18% | — | — |
Volatility
AOTG vs. TSXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AOTG | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.68% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.30% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.59% | 90.63% | -64.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.56% | 90.63% | -61.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.56% | 90.63% | -61.07% |
AOTG vs. TSXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TSXU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
AOTG vs. TSXU - Dividend Comparison
AOTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AOTG AOT Growth and Innovation ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 1.88% | 2.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AOTG and TSXU have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AOTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AOTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSXU.
TSXU has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 0.00% for AOTG.
AOTG is categorized as Technology Equities, while TSXU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: AOT and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AOTG and 1.05% for TSXU.
Find the right allocation for AOTG and TSXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer