AOTG vs. TECL
AOTG (AOT Growth and Innovation ETF) and TECL (Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - AOTG is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by AOT, while TECL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Technology Select Sector Index (300%). AOTG is actively managed, while TECL is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AOTG returned 28.98%/yr vs 78.93%/yr for TECL. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AOTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for TECL.
Performance
AOTG vs. TECL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOTG achieves a 16.15% return, which is significantly lower than TECL's 115.57% return.
AOTG
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 12.54%
- YTD
- 16.15%
- 6M
- 14.95%
- 1Y
- 39.35%
- 3Y*
- 28.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TECL
- 1D
- -4.56%
- 1M
- 55.10%
- YTD
- 115.57%
- 6M
- 106.65%
- 1Y
- 249.35%
- 3Y*
- 78.93%
- 5Y*
- 42.11%
- 10Y*
- 53.62%
AOTG vs. TECL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOTG AOT Growth and Innovation ETF | 16.15% | 25.26% | 32.20% | 54.58% | -11.53% |
TECL Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares | 115.57% | 38.60% | 36.15% | 203.14% | -24.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between AOTG and TECL is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2022 | 0.87 |
The correlation between AOTG and TECL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
AOTG vs. TECL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AOTG
TECL
Technology
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
AOTG
TECL
Communication Services
AOTG
TECL
-
Financial Services
AOTG
TECL
-
Consumer Cyclical
AOTG
TECL
-
Industrials
AOTG
TECL
Healthcare
AOTG
TECL
-
Basic Materials
AOTG
-
TECL
-
Consumer Defensive
AOTG
-
TECL
-
Energy
AOTG
-
TECL
Real Estate
AOTG
-
TECL
-
Utilities
AOTG
-
TECL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AOTG vs. TECL — Risk / Return Rank
AOTG
TECL
AOTG vs. TECL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) and Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AOTG | TECL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.46 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 5.39 | -3.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.98 | 15.48 | -10.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AOTG | TECL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 4.03 | -2.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.76 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
AOTG vs. TECL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.63%, smaller than the maximum TECL drawdown of -77.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOTG and TECL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOTG | TECL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.63% | -77.96% | +46.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.85% | -46.58% | +23.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.41% | -66.58% | +39.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -77.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -77.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -7.42% | +4.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.89% | -18.38% | +10.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.93% | 16.19% | -8.26% |
Volatility
AOTG vs. TECL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) is 7.56%, while Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) has a volatility of 21.53%. This indicates that AOTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TECL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AOTG | TECL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.56% | 21.53% | -13.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.77% | 50.05% | -31.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.89% | 62.27% | -38.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.26% | 74.08% | -44.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.26% | 72.35% | -43.09% |
AOTG vs. TECL - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TECL's 0.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
AOTG vs. TECL - Dividend Comparison
AOTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TECL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOTG AOT Growth and Innovation ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TECL Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares | 3.30% | 7.19% | 0.29% | 0.28% | 0.22% | 0.32% | 0.52% | 0.25% | 0.47% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AOTG and TECL have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TECL has higher volatility (21.53%) compared to AOTG (7.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOTG dropped -31.63% vs TECL's -77.96%.
On 3-year performance, TECL leads with 78.93% vs 28.98% for AOTG. On fees, AOTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, AOTG has been the lower-risk option at 7.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TECL has performed better with a 78.93% return vs 28.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AOTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for TECL.
TECL has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 0.00% for AOTG.
AOTG is categorized as Technology Equities, while TECL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: AOT and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AOTG and 0.91% for TECL.
TECL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.03 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AOTG and TECL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer