AOTG vs. CHPS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AOTG (AOT Growth and Innovation ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AOTG is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by AOT, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. AOTG is actively managed, while CHPS is passively managed. Over the past year, AOTG returned 39.35% vs 211.40% for CHPS. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AOTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.

Performance

AOTG vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOTG achieves a 16.15% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 103.69% return.

AOTG

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 12.54%
• YTD: 16.15%
• 6M: 14.95%
• 1Y: 39.35%
• 3Y*: 28.98%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHPS

• 1D: -2.06%
• 1M: 23.46%
• YTD: 103.69%
• 6M: 107.58%
• 1Y: 211.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOTG vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AOTG AOT Growth and Innovation ETF	16.15%	25.26%	32.20%	2.95%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	103.69%	58.47%	7.75%	10.88%

Correlation

The correlation between AOTG and CHPS is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023	0.72

The correlation between AOTG and CHPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

AOTG vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AOTG	CHPS
Technology	62.8%	98.8%
Communication Services	16.3%	-
Financial Services	11.9%	0.2%
Consumer Cyclical	8.1%	-
Industrials	0.7%	0.4%
Healthcare	0.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	0.5%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AOTG vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOTG

AOTG Risk / Return Rank: 42
AOTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
AOTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
AOTG Omega Ratio Rank: 46
AOTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
AOTG Martin Ratio Rank: 34

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 97
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOTG vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AOTG	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	6.17	-4.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	5.85	-3.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.78	-0.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.73	12.16	-10.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.98	47.22	-42.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AOTG vs. CHPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOTG Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the CHPS Sharpe Ratio of 6.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOTG and CHPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AOTG	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.65	6.17	-4.52
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.96	1.77	-0.81

Drawdowns

AOTG vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.63%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOTG and CHPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	AOTG	CHPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.63%	-39.44%	+7.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.85%	-17.50%	-5.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.81%	-2.06%	-0.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.89%	-9.15%	+1.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.93%	4.50%	+3.43%

Volatility

AOTG vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) is 7.56%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 14.07%. This indicates that AOTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AOTG	CHPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.56%	14.07%	-6.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.77%	28.29%	-9.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.89%	34.50%	-10.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.26%	33.78%	-4.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.26%	33.78%	-4.52%

AOTG vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

AOTG vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

AOTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AOTG AOT Growth and Innovation ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.33%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AOTG and CHPS in my portfolio?

AOTG and CHPS have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AOTG or CHPS?

CHPS has higher volatility (14.07%) compared to AOTG (7.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOTG dropped -31.63% vs CHPS's -39.44%.

Which ETF is better, AOTG or CHPS?

On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 211.40% vs 39.35% for AOTG. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AOTG has been the lower-risk option at 7.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AOTG or CHPS?

Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 211.40% return vs 39.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AOTG or CHPS?

CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AOTG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AOTG or CHPS?

CHPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for AOTG.

What is the main difference between AOTG and CHPS?

AOTG is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: AOT and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AOTG and 0.15% for CHPS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.17 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.