AOTG vs. AIS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AOTG (AOT Growth and Innovation ETF) and AIS (VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AOTG returned 39.35% vs 213.72% for AIS. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

AOTG vs. AIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOTG achieves a 16.15% return, which is significantly lower than AIS's 112.47% return.

AOTG

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 12.54%
• YTD: 16.15%
• 6M: 14.95%
• 1Y: 39.35%
• 3Y*: 28.98%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AIS

• 1D: -2.81%
• 1M: 25.92%
• YTD: 112.47%
• 6M: 116.72%
• 1Y: 213.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOTG vs. AIS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AOTG AOT Growth and Innovation ETF	16.15%	25.26%	-4.51%
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	112.47%	58.35%	-4.92%

Correlation

The correlation between AOTG and AIS is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024	0.76

The correlation between AOTG and AIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

AOTG vs. AIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AOTG	AIS
Technology	62.8%	84.6%
Communication Services	16.3%	-
Financial Services	11.9%	-0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	8.1%	-
Industrials	0.7%	8.9%
Healthcare	0.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	3.2%

Return for Risk

AOTG vs. AIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOTG

AOTG Risk / Return Rank: 42
AOTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
AOTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
AOTG Omega Ratio Rank: 46
AOTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
AOTG Martin Ratio Rank: 34

AIS

AIS Risk / Return Rank: 97
AIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
AIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
AIS Omega Ratio Rank: 96
AIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AIS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOTG vs. AIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AOTG	AIS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	5.96	-4.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	5.55	-3.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.76	-0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.73	13.58	-11.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.98	44.68	-39.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AOTG vs. AIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOTG Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the AIS Sharpe Ratio of 5.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOTG and AIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AOTG	AIS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.65	5.96	-4.30
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.96	3.11	-2.16

Drawdowns

AOTG vs. AIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.63%, roughly equal to the maximum AIS drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOTG and AIS.

Drawdown Indicators

	AOTG	AIS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.63%	-32.78%	+1.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.85%	-15.84%	-7.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.81%	-2.81%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.89%	-5.44%	-2.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.93%	4.81%	+3.12%

Volatility

AOTG vs. AIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) is 7.56%, while VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) has a volatility of 16.28%. This indicates that AOTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AOTG	AIS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.56%	16.28%	-8.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.77%	30.16%	-11.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.89%	36.13%	-12.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.26%	38.08%	-8.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.26%	38.08%	-8.82%

AOTG vs. AIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AOTG and AIS have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

AOTG vs. AIS - Dividend Comparison

Neither AOTG nor AIS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AOTG and AIS in my portfolio?

AOTG and AIS have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AOTG or AIS?

AIS has higher volatility (16.28%) compared to AOTG (7.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOTG dropped -31.63% vs AIS's -32.78%.

Which ETF is better, AOTG or AIS?

On 1-year performance, AIS leads with 213.72% vs 39.35% for AOTG. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, AOTG has been the lower-risk option at 7.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AOTG or AIS?

Over the 1-year period, AIS has performed better with a 213.72% return vs 39.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AOTG or AIS?

AOTG and AIS have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AOTG or AIS?

AOTG and AIS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between AOTG and AIS?

They also come from different issuers: AOT and VistaShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.96 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.