AOHY vs. UYLD
AOHY (Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF) and UYLD (Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AOHY is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Angel Oak, while UYLD is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Angel Oak. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AOHY returned 7.05% vs 5.14% for UYLD. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AOHY charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for UYLD.
Performance
AOHY vs. UYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOHY achieves a 2.21% return, which is significantly higher than UYLD's 1.95% return.
AOHY
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 2.76%
- 1Y
- 7.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UYLD
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 1.95%
- 6M
- 2.40%
- 1Y
- 5.14%
- 3Y*
- 5.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AOHY vs. UYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AOHY Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF | 2.21% | 7.62% | 7.50% |
UYLD Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF | 1.95% | 5.36% | 5.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between AOHY and UYLD is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2024 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AOHY vs. UYLD — Risk / Return Rank
AOHY
UYLD
AOHY vs. UYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF (AOHY) and Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AOHY | UYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -18.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 4.32 | -2.87 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.99 | 37.76 | -34.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.09 | 225.62 | -210.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AOHY | UYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 7.96 | -5.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.02 | 5.99 | -3.97 |
Drawdowns
AOHY vs. UYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOHY drawdown since its inception was -4.17%, which is greater than UYLD's maximum drawdown of -0.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOHY and UYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOHY | UYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -0.54% | -3.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.37% | -0.14% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | 0.00% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.35% | -0.03% | -0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.47% | 0.02% | +0.45% |
Volatility
AOHY vs. UYLD - Volatility Comparison
Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF (AOHY) has a higher volatility of 0.99% compared to Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD) at 0.38%. This indicates that AOHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AOHY | UYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.99% | 0.38% | +0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.50% | 0.50% | +2.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.18% | 0.65% | +2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.79% | 1.00% | +2.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.79% | 1.00% | +2.79% |
AOHY vs. UYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOHY has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than UYLD's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
AOHY vs. UYLD - Dividend Comparison
AOHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.51%, more than UYLD's 5.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOHY Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF | 6.51% | 6.53% | 6.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UYLD Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF | 5.03% | 5.07% | 4.97% | 5.92% | 0.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AOHY and UYLD have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AOHY has higher volatility (0.99%) compared to UYLD (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOHY dropped -4.17% vs UYLD's -0.54%.
On 1-year performance, AOHY leads with 7.05% vs 5.14% for UYLD. On fees, UYLD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, UYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AOHY has performed better with a 7.05% return vs 5.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UYLD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for AOHY.
AOHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.51%, compared with 5.03% for UYLD.
AOHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while UYLD is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for AOHY and 0.29% for UYLD.
UYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.96 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AOHY and UYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer