AOHY vs. PIT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

AOHY (Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF) and PIT (VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AOHY is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Angel Oak, while PIT is a Commodities fund actively managed by VanEck. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AOHY returned 6.55% vs 38.33% for PIT. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.55% expense ratio.

Performance

AOHY vs. PIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF (AOHY) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOHY achieves a 2.38% return, which is significantly lower than PIT's 27.31% return.

AOHY

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.53%
• YTD: 2.38%
• 6M: 2.70%
• 1Y: 6.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PIT

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: -10.60%
• YTD: 27.31%
• 6M: 26.74%
• 1Y: 38.33%
• 3Y*: 19.51%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOHY vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AOHY Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF	2.38%	7.62%	7.70%
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	27.31%	21.63%	3.91%

Correlation

The correlation between AOHY and PIT is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2024	0.02

The correlation between AOHY and PIT shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AOHY vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOHY

AOHY Risk / Return Rank: 69
AOHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
AOHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
AOHY Omega Ratio Rank: 74
AOHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
AOHY Martin Ratio Rank: 75

PIT

PIT Risk / Return Rank: 55
PIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
PIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
PIT Omega Ratio Rank: 52
PIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
PIT Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOHY vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF (AOHY) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AOHY	PIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	1.78	+0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	2.32	+0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.32	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	2.74	+0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.90	10.88	+3.02

AOHY vs. PIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOHY Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the PIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOHY and PIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AOHY vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOHY drawdown since its inception was -4.17%, smaller than the maximum PIT drawdown of -14.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOHY and PIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AOHY	PIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.17%	-14.05%	+9.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.37%	-14.05%	+11.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.23%	-14.05%	+13.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.35%	-4.07%	+3.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.47%	3.59%	-3.12%

Volatility

AOHY vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF (AOHY) is 0.75%, while VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that AOHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AOHY	PIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.75%	4.67%	-3.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.53%	19.36%	-16.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.18%	21.66%	-18.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.77%	17.50%	-13.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.77%	17.50%	-13.73%

AOHY vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AOHY and PIT have an expense ratio of 0.55%.

Dividends

AOHY vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison

AOHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.50%, less than PIT's 7.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AOHY Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF	6.50%	6.53%	6.04%	0.00%
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	7.00%	8.92%	3.59%	6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AOHY and PIT in my portfolio?

AOHY and PIT have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AOHY or PIT?

PIT has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to AOHY (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOHY dropped -4.17% vs PIT's -14.05%.

Which ETF is better, AOHY or PIT?

On 1-year performance, PIT leads with 38.33% vs 6.55% for AOHY. Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. On volatility, AOHY has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AOHY or PIT?

Over the 1-year period, PIT has performed better with a 38.33% return vs 6.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AOHY or PIT?

AOHY and PIT have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AOHY or PIT?

PIT has the higher dividend yield at 7.00%, compared with 6.50% for AOHY.

What is the main difference between AOHY and PIT?

AOHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while PIT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Angel Oak and VanEck.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AOHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.