PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AOHY vs. FLRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AOHY vs. FLRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF (AOHY) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AOHY vs. FLRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AOHY
Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF
0.49%7.62%7.50%
FLRT
Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF
-0.20%6.24%7.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOHY achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly higher than FLRT's -0.20% return.


AOHY

1D
0.46%
1M
-0.64%
YTD
0.49%
6M
1.33%
1Y
6.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FLRT

1D
0.04%
1M
0.58%
YTD
-0.20%
6M
1.29%
1Y
5.44%
3Y*
8.83%
5Y*
5.70%
10Y*
4.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AOHY vs. FLRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOHY has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FLRT's 0.69% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AOHY vs. FLRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOHY
AOHY Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
AOHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOHY Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
AOHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOHY Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FLRT
FLRT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FLRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRT Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRT Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOHY vs. FLRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF (AOHY) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AOHYFLRTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.57

1.80

-0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.30

2.31

-0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.56

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

2.15

-0.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.01

8.63

+1.38

AOHY vs. FLRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the FLRT Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOHY and FLRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AOHYFLRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

1.80

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.94

0.73

+1.21

Correlation

The correlation between AOHY and FLRT is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

AOHY vs. FLRT - Dividend Comparison

AOHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%, less than FLRT's 6.92% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOHY
Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF
6.58%6.53%6.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLRT
Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF
6.92%6.93%7.93%8.40%5.81%3.16%3.52%4.30%3.95%3.20%3.38%3.21%

Drawdowns

AOHY vs. FLRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOHY drawdown since its inception was -4.17%, smaller than the maximum FLRT drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOHY and FLRT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AOHYFLRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-20.96%

+16.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.55%

-2.47%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-0.88%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.36%

-1.43%

+1.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

0.62%

+0.06%

Volatility

AOHY vs. FLRT - Volatility Comparison

Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF (AOHY) has a higher volatility of 1.93% compared to Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT) at 0.46%. This indicates that AOHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AOHYFLRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.93%

0.46%

+1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.56%

1.22%

+1.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.43%

3.04%

+1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.83%

2.32%

+1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.83%

6.24%

-2.41%