AOHY vs. CXRN
AOHY (Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF) and CXRN (Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AOHY is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Angel Oak, while CXRN is a Leveraged Commodities fund actively managed by Teucrium. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AOHY returned 7.05% vs -25.61% for CXRN. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. AOHY charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for CXRN.
Performance
AOHY vs. CXRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOHY achieves a 2.21% return, which is significantly higher than CXRN's -16.09% return.
AOHY
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 2.76%
- 1Y
- 7.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CXRN
- 1D
- -3.08%
- 1M
- -22.43%
- YTD
- -16.09%
- 6M
- -18.12%
- 1Y
- -25.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AOHY vs. CXRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AOHY Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF | 2.21% | 7.62% | -0.56% |
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF | -16.09% | -25.68% | 7.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between AOHY and CXRN is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024 | -0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AOHY vs. CXRN — Risk / Return Rank
AOHY
CXRN
AOHY vs. CXRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF (AOHY) and Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AOHY | CXRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 0.90 | +0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.99 | -0.96 | +3.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.09 | -1.82 | +16.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AOHY | CXRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | -0.71 | +2.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.02 | -0.65 | +2.67 |
Drawdowns
AOHY vs. CXRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOHY drawdown since its inception was -4.17%, smaller than the maximum CXRN drawdown of -47.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOHY and CXRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOHY | CXRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -47.82% | +43.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.37% | -26.83% | +24.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -47.82% | +47.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.35% | -30.13% | +29.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.47% | 14.07% | -13.60% |
Volatility
AOHY vs. CXRN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF (AOHY) is 0.99%, while Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) has a volatility of 15.47%. This indicates that AOHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CXRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AOHY | CXRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.99% | 15.47% | -14.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.50% | 26.83% | -24.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.18% | 36.45% | -33.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.79% | 36.94% | -33.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.79% | 36.94% | -33.15% |
AOHY vs. CXRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOHY has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than CXRN's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
AOHY vs. CXRN - Dividend Comparison
AOHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.51%, more than CXRN's 2.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AOHY Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF | 6.51% | 6.53% | 6.04% |
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF | 2.69% | 3.30% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AOHY and CXRN have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CXRN has higher volatility (15.47%) compared to AOHY (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOHY dropped -4.17% vs CXRN's -47.82%.
On 1-year performance, AOHY leads with 7.05% vs -25.61% for CXRN. On fees, AOHY is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, AOHY has been the lower-risk option at 0.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AOHY has performed better with a 7.05% return vs -25.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AOHY is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CXRN.
AOHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.51%, compared with 2.69% for CXRN.
AOHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while CXRN is Leveraged Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Angel Oak and Teucrium. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for AOHY and 0.95% for CXRN.
AOHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AOHY and CXRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer