PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AOHY vs. CXRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AOHY vs. CXRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF (AOHY) and Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOHY achieves a 2.21% return, which is significantly higher than CXRN's -16.09% return.


AOHY

1D
0.06%
1M
0.45%
YTD
2.21%
6M
2.76%
1Y
7.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CXRN

1D
-3.08%
1M
-22.43%
YTD
-16.09%
6M
-18.12%
1Y
-25.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOHY vs. CXRN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AOHY
Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF
2.21%7.62%-0.56%
CXRN
Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF
-16.09%-25.68%7.40%

Correlation

The correlation between AOHY and CXRN is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024

-0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AOHY vs. CXRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOHY
AOHY Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
AOHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOHY Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
AOHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

CXRN
CXRN Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
CXRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CXRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
CXRN Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
CXRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
CXRN Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOHY vs. CXRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF (AOHY) and Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AOHYCXRNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

0.90

+0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

-0.96

+3.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.09

-1.82

+16.91

AOHY vs. CXRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOHY Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is higher than the CXRN Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOHY and CXRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AOHYCXRNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

-0.71

+2.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.02

-0.65

+2.67

Drawdowns

AOHY vs. CXRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOHY drawdown since its inception was -4.17%, smaller than the maximum CXRN drawdown of -47.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOHY and CXRN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AOHYCXRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-47.82%

+43.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.37%

-26.83%

+24.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-47.82%

+47.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.35%

-30.13%

+29.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.47%

14.07%

-13.60%

Volatility

AOHY vs. CXRN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF (AOHY) is 0.99%, while Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) has a volatility of 15.47%. This indicates that AOHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CXRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AOHYCXRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

15.47%

-14.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.50%

26.83%

-24.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.18%

36.45%

-33.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.79%

36.94%

-33.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.79%

36.94%

-33.15%

AOHY vs. CXRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOHY has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than CXRN's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

AOHY vs. CXRN - Dividend Comparison

AOHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.51%, more than CXRN's 2.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AOHY
Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF
6.51%6.53%6.04%
CXRN
Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF
2.69%3.30%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


AOHY and CXRN have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CXRN has higher volatility (15.47%) compared to AOHY (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOHY dropped -4.17% vs CXRN's -47.82%.

On 1-year performance, AOHY leads with 7.05% vs -25.61% for CXRN. On fees, AOHY is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, AOHY has been the lower-risk option at 0.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AOHY has performed better with a 7.05% return vs -25.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AOHY is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CXRN.

AOHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.51%, compared with 2.69% for CXRN.

AOHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while CXRN is Leveraged Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Angel Oak and Teucrium. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for AOHY and 0.95% for CXRN.

AOHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AOHY and CXRN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer