AOD vs. OWL
AOD (Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund) and OWL (Blue Owl Capital Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 5 years, AOD returned 10.87%/yr vs -3.88%/yr for OWL. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AOD vs. OWL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOD achieves a 12.61% return, which is significantly higher than OWL's -40.47% return.
AOD
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 12.61%
- 6M
- 11.13%
- 1Y
- 33.31%
- 3Y*
- 20.75%
- 5Y*
- 10.87%
- 10Y*
- 13.38%
OWL
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -17.12%
- YTD
- -40.47%
- 6M
- -41.68%
- 1Y
- -53.07%
- 3Y*
- -5.39%
- 5Y*
- -3.88%
- 10Y*
- —
AOD vs. OWL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOD Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund | 12.61% | 32.14% | 16.03% | 12.65% | -17.15% | 23.80% | 1.80% |
OWL Blue Owl Capital Inc. | -40.47% | -32.83% | 61.76% | 47.40% | -26.29% | 32.18% | 5.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between AOD and OWL is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2020 | 0.48 |
The correlation between AOD and OWL shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AOD:
$93.67M
OWL:
$2.94B
AOD:
$252.71M
OWL:
$1.99B
AOD:
$55.11M
OWL:
$876.72M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AOD vs. OWL — Risk / Return Rank
AOD
OWL
AOD vs. OWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) and Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AOD | OWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 0.78 | +0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | -0.91 | +2.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.59 | -1.52 | +10.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AOD vs. OWL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOD drawdown since its inception was -72.26%, which is greater than OWL's maximum drawdown of -67.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOD and OWL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOD | OWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.26% | -67.10% | -5.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.71% | -58.59% | +41.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.71% | -67.10% | +50.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.92% | -67.10% | +38.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.78% | -65.14% | +63.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.20% | -24.41% | -2.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.89% | 35.05% | -31.16% |
Volatility
AOD vs. OWL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is 5.22%, while Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) has a volatility of 13.41%. This indicates that AOD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AOD | OWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.22% | 13.41% | -8.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.70% | 34.97% | -21.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.99% | 44.46% | -28.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.77% | 42.07% | -25.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.52% | 42.76% | -24.24% |
Dividends
AOD vs. OWL - Dividend Comparison
AOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.81%, more than OWL's 10.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOD Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund | 11.81% | 12.00% | 10.73% | 8.56% | 8.85% | 6.75% | 7.80% | 7.71% | 9.57% | 7.29% | 9.10% | 8.93% |
OWL Blue Owl Capital Inc. | 10.62% | 5.72% | 2.92% | 3.69% | 4.06% | 0.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
AOD vs. OWL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund and Blue Owl Capital Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
AOD and OWL have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OWL has higher volatility (13.41%) compared to AOD (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOD dropped -72.26% vs OWL's -67.10%.
AOD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AOD and OWL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer