PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AOD vs. DBSDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AOD vs. DBSDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) and DBS Group Holdings Ltd ADR (DBSDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOD achieves a 12.61% return, which is significantly lower than DBSDY's 18.81% return. Over the past 10 years, AOD has underperformed DBSDY with an annualized return of 13.38%, while DBSDY has yielded a comparatively higher 23.18% annualized return.


AOD

1D
1.27%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
12.61%
6M
11.13%
1Y
33.31%
3Y*
20.75%
5Y*
10.87%
10Y*
13.38%

DBSDY

1D
0.74%
1M
4.02%
YTD
18.81%
6M
19.14%
1Y
52.08%
3Y*
41.40%
5Y*
26.90%
10Y*
23.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOD vs. DBSDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AOD
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund
12.61%32.14%16.03%12.65%-17.15%23.80%8.12%34.83%-17.63%35.37%
DBSDY
DBS Group Holdings Ltd ADR
18.81%44.73%47.43%7.13%8.63%32.34%1.70%18.17%-0.93%63.53%

Correlation

The correlation between AOD and DBSDY is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007

0.43

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

AOD:

$93.67M

DBSDY:

SGD 36.24B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AOD:

$252.71M

DBSDY:

SGD 36.24B

EBITDA (TTM)

AOD:

$55.11M

DBSDY:

SGD 9.54B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AOD vs. DBSDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOD
AOD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOD Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOD Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

DBSDY
DBSDY Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
DBSDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBSDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBSDY Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DBSDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBSDY Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOD vs. DBSDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) and DBS Group Holdings Ltd ADR (DBSDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AODDBSDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.57

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

5.53

-3.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.59

16.52

-7.94

AOD vs. DBSDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOD Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is lower than the DBSDY Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOD and DBSDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AOD vs. DBSDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOD drawdown since its inception was -72.26%, roughly equal to the maximum DBSDY drawdown of -74.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOD and DBSDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AODDBSDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.26%

-74.39%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.71%

-9.46%

-7.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.71%

-18.75%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.92%

-22.02%

-6.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.68%

-43.94%

+0.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

-0.78%

-1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.20%

-14.93%

-12.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.89%

3.16%

+0.73%

Volatility

AOD vs. DBSDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is 5.22%, while DBS Group Holdings Ltd ADR (DBSDY) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that AOD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBSDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AODDBSDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.22%

5.82%

-0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.70%

12.35%

+1.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.99%

16.57%

-0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.77%

18.84%

-2.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.52%

21.60%

-3.08%

Dividends

AOD vs. DBSDY - Dividend Comparison

AOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.81%, more than DBSDY's 4.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOD
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund
11.81%12.00%10.73%8.56%8.85%6.75%7.80%7.71%9.57%7.29%9.10%8.93%
DBSDY
DBS Group Holdings Ltd ADR
4.07%4.42%4.94%6.76%4.09%3.11%2.55%6.59%7.22%3.53%7.42%3.77%

Financials

AOD vs. DBSDY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund and DBS Group Holdings Ltd ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
26.44M
11.89B
(AOD) Total Revenue
(DBSDY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. AOD values in USD, DBSDY values in SGD

Frequently Asked Questions


AOD and DBSDY have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBSDY has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to AOD (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOD dropped -72.26% vs DBSDY's -74.39%.

DBSDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AOD and DBSDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer