ANXU.L vs. XNAQ.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ANXU.L (Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD) and XNAQ.L (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C) are both Nasdaq-100 funds tracking the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, from Amundi and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ANXU.L returned 17.78%/yr vs 17.71%/yr for XNAQ.L. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ANXU.L charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XNAQ.L.

Performance

ANXU.L vs. XNAQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ANXU.L is traded in USD, while XNAQ.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XNAQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ANXU.L having a 19.66% return and XNAQ.L slightly lower at 19.60%.

ANXU.L

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 6.79%
• YTD: 19.66%
• 6M: 18.74%
• 1Y: 39.57%
• 3Y*: 28.16%
• 5Y*: 17.78%
• 10Y*: 21.70%

XNAQ.L

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: 8.70%
• YTD: 19.60%
• 6M: 19.33%
• 1Y: 40.49%
• 3Y*: 28.03%
• 5Y*: 17.71%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANXU.L vs. XNAQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ANXU.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD	19.66%	19.86%	26.74%	56.50%	-33.24%	23.86%
XNAQ.L Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C	19.61%	20.14%	26.48%	55.63%	-33.41%	24.52%

Correlation

The correlation between ANXU.L and XNAQ.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021	0.95

The correlation between ANXU.L and XNAQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

ANXU.L vs. XNAQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ANXU.L	XNAQ.L
Technology	53.7%	53.7%
Communication Services	15.8%	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	12.2%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	7.7%
Healthcare	4.2%	4.2%
Industrials	3.1%	3.1%
Utilities	1.4%	1.4%
Basic Materials	1.1%	1.1%
Energy	0.6%	0.6%
Financial Services	0.2%	0.2%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.1%

Return for Risk

ANXU.L vs. XNAQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANXU.L

ANXU.L Risk / Return Rank: 76
ANXU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
ANXU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
ANXU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 75
ANXU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
ANXU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 71

XNAQ.L

XNAQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 78
XNAQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
XNAQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
XNAQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 83
XNAQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
XNAQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANXU.L vs. XNAQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ANXU.L	XNAQ.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.54	2.62	-0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.51	3.60	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.45	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.66	3.65	+0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.14	13.39	-0.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ANXU.L vs. XNAQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANXU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the XNAQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANXU.L and XNAQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ANXU.L	XNAQ.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.54	2.62	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86	0.87	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.17	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.19	0.85	+0.35

Drawdowns

ANXU.L vs. XNAQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANXU.L drawdown since its inception was -35.13%, roughly equal to the maximum XNAQ.L drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANXU.L and XNAQ.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ANXU.L	XNAQ.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.13%	-35.12%	-0.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.01%	-11.05%	+0.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.45%	-23.11%	+0.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.13%	-35.12%	-0.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.77%	-0.77%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.77%	-8.65%	+2.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.08%	3.01%	+0.07%

Volatility

ANXU.L vs. XNAQ.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L) at 4.38%. This indicates that ANXU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XNAQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ANXU.L	XNAQ.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.03%	4.38%	+0.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.93%	11.26%	+0.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.91%	15.37%	+0.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.79%	20.38%	+0.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.15%	20.43%	+0.72%

ANXU.L vs. XNAQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANXU.L has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than XNAQ.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ANXU.L vs. XNAQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ANXU.L nor XNAQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ANXU.L and XNAQ.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, ANXU.L and XNAQ.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, ANXU.L or XNAQ.L?

On fees, ANXU.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ANXU.L or XNAQ.L?

ANXU.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XNAQ.L.

What is the main difference between ANXU.L and XNAQ.L?

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for ANXU.L and 0.20% for XNAQ.L.