PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ANXU.L vs. MWRD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ANXU.L vs. MWRD.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ANXU.L (Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD) and MWRD.L (Amundi Index MSCI World) are both exchange-traded funds - ANXU.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while MWRD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ANXU.L charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for MWRD.L.

Performance

ANXU.L vs. MWRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ANXU.L is traded in USD, while MWRD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MWRD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

ANXU.L

1D
-0.70%
1M
6.79%
YTD
19.66%
6M
18.74%
1Y
39.57%
3Y*
28.16%
5Y*
17.78%
10Y*
21.70%

MWRD.L

1D
—
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANXU.L vs. MWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ANXU.L
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD		19.66%19.86%26.74%56.50%-33.24%27.83%47.17%40.88%-1.76%14.51%
MWRD.L
Amundi Index MSCI World		0.00%0.00%-1.64%23.69%-18.69%22.97%15.27%28.71%-9.87%10.61%

Correlation

The correlation between ANXU.L and MWRD.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2017

0.60

The correlation between ANXU.L and MWRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (3 years) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ANXU.L vs. MWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ANXU.L
MWRD.L

Technology

53.7%
24.7%

Communication Services

15.8%
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
6.7%

Healthcare

4.2%
12.4%

Industrials

3.1%
10.6%

Utilities

1.4%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.1%
3.8%

Energy

0.6%
4.4%

Financial Services

0.2%
14.7%

Real Estate

0.1%
2.4%

Technology

ANXU.L
53.7%
MWRD.L
24.7%

Communication Services

ANXU.L
15.8%
MWRD.L
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

ANXU.L
12.2%
MWRD.L
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

ANXU.L
7.7%
MWRD.L
6.7%

Healthcare

ANXU.L
4.2%
MWRD.L
12.4%

Industrials

ANXU.L
3.1%
MWRD.L
10.6%

Utilities

ANXU.L
1.4%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Basic Materials

ANXU.L
1.1%
MWRD.L
3.8%

Energy

ANXU.L
0.6%
MWRD.L
4.4%

Financial Services

ANXU.L
0.2%
MWRD.L
14.7%

Real Estate

ANXU.L
0.1%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD

Amundi Index MSCI World

Often compared with ANXU.L:
ANXU.L vs. CNDX.ASANXU.L vs. EQQQ.DEANXU.L vs. QQQMANXU.L vs. QQQANXU.L vs. RACE.MIANXU.L vs. 10AJ.DEANXU.L vs. DAPP.L
Often compared with MWRD.L:
MWRD.L vs. BRK-BMWRD.L vs. IWDA.ASMWRD.L vs. URTHMWRD.L vs. SWDA.LMWRD.L vs. JEPIMWRD.L vs. ACWIMWRD.L vs. 36BZ.DE

Return for Risk

ANXU.L vs. MWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ANXU.L
ANXU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ANXU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
MWRD.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANXU.L vs. MWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ANXU.LMWRD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.54

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.51

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.14

—

—

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ANXU.L vs. MWRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ANXU.LMWRD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.17

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.19

—

—

Drawdowns

ANXU.L vs. MWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ANXU.LMWRD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.13%

—

—

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.01%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.45%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.13%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.13%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

—

—

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.77%

—

—

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

—

—

Volatility

ANXU.L vs. MWRD.L - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ANXU.LMWRD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.03%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.93%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.91%

—

—

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.79%

—

—

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.15%

—

—

ANXU.L vs. MWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANXU.L has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than MWRD.L's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ANXU.L vs. MWRD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ANXU.L nor MWRD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

ANXU.L and MWRD.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MWRD.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for ANXU.L.

ANXU.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while MWRD.L is Global Equities. ANXU.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while MWRD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for ANXU.L and 0.08% for MWRD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANXU.L and MWRD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer