ANXU.L vs. LCUK.L

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

ANXU.L (Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD) and LCUK.L (Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - ANXU.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while LCUK.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ANXU.L returned 15.97%/yr vs 9.82%/yr for LCUK.L. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ANXU.L charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for LCUK.L.

Performance

ANXU.L vs. LCUK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) and Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ANXU.L is traded in USD, while LCUK.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the LCUK.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANXU.L achieves a 15.62% return, which is significantly higher than LCUK.L's 5.65% return.

ANXU.L

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: -1.91%
• YTD: 15.62%
• 6M: 14.93%
• 1Y: 32.60%
• 3Y*: 26.15%
• 5Y*: 15.97%
• 10Y*: 22.19%

LCUK.L

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: -1.02%
• YTD: 5.65%
• 6M: 5.76%
• 1Y: 19.43%
• 3Y*: 17.52%
• 5Y*: 9.82%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANXU.L vs. LCUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ANXU.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD	15.62%	19.86%	26.74%	56.50%	-33.24%	27.99%	48.47%	39.48%	-9.57%
LCUK.L Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	5.65%	34.26%	7.24%	12.85%	-8.71%	16.94%	-9.10%	23.48%	-12.60%

Correlation

The correlation between ANXU.L and LCUK.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2018	0.50

The correlation between ANXU.L and LCUK.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ANXU.L vs. LCUK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ANXU.L	LCUK.L
Technology	58.5%	1.0%
Communication Services	14.3%	3.0%
Consumer Cyclical	11.4%	5.4%
Consumer Defensive	6.4%	13.6%
Healthcare	3.7%	13.0%
Industrials	2.8%	14.2%
Utilities	1.2%	4.6%
Basic Materials	1.0%	8.8%
Energy	0.5%	10.2%
Financial Services	0.2%	24.8%
Real Estate	0.1%	1.4%

Return for Risk

ANXU.L vs. LCUK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANXU.L

ANXU.L Risk / Return Rank: 67
ANXU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
ANXU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
ANXU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 65
ANXU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
ANXU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 65

LCUK.L

LCUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
LCUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
LCUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
LCUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 71
LCUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
LCUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANXU.L vs. LCUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) and Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ANXU.L	LCUK.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	1.37	+0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	1.96	+0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.24	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.95	1.92	+1.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.19	6.07	+4.12

ANXU.L vs. LCUK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANXU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the LCUK.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANXU.L and LCUK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ANXU.L vs. LCUK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANXU.L drawdown since its inception was -35.13%, smaller than the maximum LCUK.L drawdown of -43.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANXU.L and LCUK.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ANXU.L	LCUK.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.13%	-43.12%	+7.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.01%	-10.08%	-0.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.45%	-13.37%	-9.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.13%	-27.37%	-7.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.12%	-4.38%	+0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.05%	-7.19%	+2.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.19%	3.19%	0.00%

Volatility

ANXU.L vs. LCUK.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) has a higher volatility of 6.48% compared to Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L) at 3.43%. This indicates that ANXU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCUK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ANXU.L	LCUK.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.48%	3.43%	+3.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.22%	11.70%	+1.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.79%	14.12%	+2.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.91%	16.74%	+4.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.11%	18.79%	+1.32%

ANXU.L vs. LCUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANXU.L has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUK.L's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ANXU.L vs. LCUK.L - Dividend Comparison

ANXU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LCUK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ANXU.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LCUK.L Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	2.82%	3.04%	3.68%	3.05%	3.93%	3.87%	2.99%	3.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ANXU.L and LCUK.L in my portfolio?

ANXU.L and LCUK.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ANXU.L or LCUK.L?

On fees, LCUK.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ANXU.L or LCUK.L?

LCUK.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for ANXU.L.

What is the main difference between ANXU.L and LCUK.L?

ANXU.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while LCUK.L is Europe Equities. ANXU.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while LCUK.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for ANXU.L and 0.04% for LCUK.L.