ANXG.L vs. XNAQ.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ANXG.L (Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD) and XNAQ.L (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - ANXG.L tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index while XNAQ.L tracks the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ANXG.L returned 19.03%/yr vs 18.96%/yr for XNAQ.L. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ANXG.L charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XNAQ.L.

Performance

ANXG.L vs. XNAQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ANXG.L is traded in GBp, while XNAQ.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XNAQ.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ANXG.L having a 19.88% return and XNAQ.L slightly higher at 19.89%.

ANXG.L

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: 8.17%
• YTD: 19.88%
• 6M: 17.66%
• 1Y: 41.02%
• 3Y*: 24.84%
• 5Y*: 19.03%
• 10Y*: 22.61%

XNAQ.L

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 8.16%
• YTD: 19.89%
• 6M: 17.66%
• 1Y: 41.02%
• 3Y*: 24.81%
• 5Y*: 18.96%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANXG.L vs. XNAQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ANXG.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD	19.88%	11.70%	28.70%	48.00%	-25.42%	26.32%
XNAQ.L Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C	19.89%	11.71%	28.62%	47.83%	-25.44%	26.22%

Correlation

The correlation between ANXG.L and XNAQ.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021	0.98

The correlation between ANXG.L and XNAQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

ANXG.L vs. XNAQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ANXG.L	XNAQ.L
Technology	53.7%	53.7%
Communication Services	15.8%	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	12.2%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	7.7%
Healthcare	4.2%	4.2%
Industrials	3.1%	3.1%
Utilities	1.4%	1.4%
Basic Materials	1.1%	1.1%
Energy	0.6%	0.6%
Financial Services	0.2%	0.2%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.1%

Return for Risk

ANXG.L vs. XNAQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANXG.L

ANXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 78
ANXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
ANXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
ANXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 82
ANXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
ANXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 62

XNAQ.L

XNAQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 78
XNAQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
XNAQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
XNAQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 83
XNAQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
XNAQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANXG.L vs. XNAQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ANXG.L	XNAQ.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.85	2.83	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.67	3.70	-0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.50	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.75	3.79	-0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.95	11.13	-0.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ANXG.L vs. XNAQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANXG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is comparable to the XNAQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANXG.L and XNAQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ANXG.L	XNAQ.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.85	2.83	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99	1.00	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.17	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.18	0.93	+0.25

Drawdowns

ANXG.L vs. XNAQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANXG.L drawdown since its inception was -27.69%, roughly equal to the maximum XNAQ.L drawdown of -27.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANXG.L and XNAQ.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ANXG.L	XNAQ.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.69%	-27.52%	-0.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.12%	-10.99%	-0.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.54%	-24.56%	+0.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.69%	-27.52%	-0.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.64%	-0.63%	-0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.35%	-7.01%	+1.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.81%	3.75%	+0.06%

Volatility

ANXG.L vs. XNAQ.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L) have volatilities of 4.14% and 4.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ANXG.L	XNAQ.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.14%	4.18%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.39%	10.38%	+0.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.62%	14.73%	-0.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.12%	19.04%	+0.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.31%	19.13%	+0.18%

ANXG.L vs. XNAQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANXG.L has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than XNAQ.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ANXG.L vs. XNAQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ANXG.L nor XNAQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ANXG.L and XNAQ.L in my portfolio?

ANXG.L and XNAQ.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ANXG.L or XNAQ.L?

On fees, ANXG.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ANXG.L or XNAQ.L?

ANXG.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XNAQ.L.

What is the main difference between ANXG.L and XNAQ.L?

ANXG.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while XNAQ.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for ANXG.L and 0.20% for XNAQ.L.