PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANXG.L vs. QQQO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ANXG.L vs. QQQO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANXG.L achieves a 19.88% return, which is significantly higher than QQQO.L's 15.53% return.


ANXG.L

1D
-0.64%
1M
9.65%
YTD
19.88%
6M
18.47%
1Y
41.85%
3Y*
24.84%
5Y*
19.03%
10Y*
22.61%

QQQO.L

1D
-0.66%
1M
6.84%
YTD
15.53%
6M
14.50%
1Y
33.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANXG.L vs. QQQO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ANXG.L
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD
19.88%11.70%16.27%
QQQO.L
IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP
15.53%6.57%12.88%

Correlation

The correlation between ANXG.L and QQQO.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2024

0.64

The correlation between ANXG.L and QQQO.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANXG.L vs. QQQO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANXG.L
ANXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ANXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ANXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQO.L
QQQO.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QQQO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANXG.L vs. QQQO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ANXG.LQQQO.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.46

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

4.71

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.95

11.27

-0.32

ANXG.L vs. QQQO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANXG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is comparable to the QQQO.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANXG.L and QQQO.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ANXG.LQQQO.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85

2.37

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

1.18

0.00

Drawdowns

ANXG.L vs. QQQO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANXG.L drawdown since its inception was -27.69%, which is greater than QQQO.L's maximum drawdown of -21.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANXG.L and QQQO.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANXG.LQQQO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.69%

-21.70%

-5.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.12%

-7.04%

-4.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-0.66%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.35%

-4.40%

-0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.81%

2.95%

+0.86%

Volatility

ANXG.L vs. QQQO.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L) at 3.90%. This indicates that ANXG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANXG.LQQQO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

3.90%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.39%

8.93%

+1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.62%

14.00%

+0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.12%

17.34%

+1.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.31%

17.34%

+1.97%

ANXG.L vs. QQQO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANXG.L has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQO.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

ANXG.L vs. QQQO.L - Dividend Comparison

ANXG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 67.52%.


PositionTTM20252024
ANXG.L
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQO.L
IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP
67.52%124.53%17.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


ANXG.L and QQQO.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ANXG.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ANXG.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for QQQO.L.

They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for ANXG.L and 0.45% for QQQO.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANXG.L and QQQO.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer