ANXG.L vs. EQQD.L
ANXG.L (Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD) and EQQD.L (Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - ANXG.L tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index while EQQD.L tracks the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ANXG.L returned 24.84%/yr vs 25.03%/yr for EQQD.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ANXG.L charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for EQQD.L.
Performance
ANXG.L vs. EQQD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ANXG.L is traded in GBp, while EQQD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EQQD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ANXG.L having a 19.88% return and EQQD.L slightly higher at 20.25%.
ANXG.L
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 9.65%
- YTD
- 19.88%
- 6M
- 18.47%
- 1Y
- 41.85%
- 3Y*
- 24.84%
- 5Y*
- 19.03%
- 10Y*
- 22.61%
EQQD.L
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 9.59%
- YTD
- 20.25%
- 6M
- 18.39%
- 1Y
- 41.88%
- 3Y*
- 25.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ANXG.L vs. EQQD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANXG.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | 19.88% | 11.70% | 28.70% | 48.00% | -25.42% | 19.28% |
EQQD.L Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist | 20.25% | 11.36% | 28.96% | 48.78% | -25.39% | 18.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANXG.L and EQQD.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021 | 0.94 |
The correlation between ANXG.L and EQQD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
ANXG.L vs. EQQD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ANXG.L
EQQD.L
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
ANXG.L
EQQD.L
Communication Services
ANXG.L
EQQD.L
Consumer Cyclical
ANXG.L
EQQD.L
Consumer Defensive
ANXG.L
EQQD.L
Healthcare
ANXG.L
EQQD.L
Industrials
ANXG.L
EQQD.L
Utilities
ANXG.L
EQQD.L
Basic Materials
ANXG.L
EQQD.L
Energy
ANXG.L
EQQD.L
Financial Services
ANXG.L
EQQD.L
Real Estate
ANXG.L
EQQD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANXG.L vs. EQQD.L — Risk / Return Rank
ANXG.L
EQQD.L
ANXG.L vs. EQQD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) and Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist (EQQD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ANXG.L | EQQD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.47 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.75 | 3.76 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.95 | 10.68 | +0.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ANXG.L | EQQD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85 | 2.66 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.18 | 0.90 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
ANXG.L vs. EQQD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANXG.L drawdown since its inception was -27.69%, roughly equal to the maximum EQQD.L drawdown of -27.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANXG.L and EQQD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANXG.L | EQQD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.69% | -27.45% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.12% | -11.10% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.54% | -24.40% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | -0.73% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.35% | -7.33% | +1.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.81% | 3.91% | -0.10% |
Volatility
ANXG.L vs. EQQD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) is 4.14%, while Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist (EQQD.L) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that ANXG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQQD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANXG.L | EQQD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.14% | 5.00% | -0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.39% | 11.43% | -1.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.62% | 15.66% | -1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.12% | 20.06% | -0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.31% | 20.06% | -0.75% |
ANXG.L vs. EQQD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANXG.L has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQD.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ANXG.L vs. EQQD.L - Dividend Comparison
ANXG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANXG.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EQQD.L Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist | 0.54% | 0.64% | 0.75% | 0.75% | 0.95% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ANXG.L and EQQD.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ANXG.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ANXG.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EQQD.L.
ANXG.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while EQQD.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for ANXG.L and 0.20% for EQQD.L.
Find the right allocation for ANXG.L and EQQD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer