PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANWFX vs. MDGCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ANWFX vs. MDGCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds New Perspective Fund Class F-2 (ANWFX) and BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANWFX achieves a 7.45% return, which is significantly lower than MDGCX's 19.80% return. Over the past 10 years, ANWFX has outperformed MDGCX with an annualized return of 13.71%, while MDGCX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.56% annualized return.


ANWFX

1D
0.11%
1M
5.21%
YTD
7.45%
6M
8.54%
1Y
20.75%
3Y*
18.87%
5Y*
9.19%
10Y*
13.71%

MDGCX

1D
0.70%
1M
7.14%
YTD
19.80%
6M
21.05%
1Y
40.27%
3Y*
22.15%
5Y*
11.84%
10Y*
12.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANWFX vs. MDGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ANWFX
American Funds New Perspective Fund Class F-2
7.45%21.60%16.98%24.93%-25.76%17.88%33.71%30.36%-5.79%29.13%
MDGCX
BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.
19.80%23.61%10.87%22.43%-17.94%17.52%15.61%25.54%-11.73%23.41%

Correlation

The correlation between ANWFX and MDGCX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2008

0.93

The correlation between ANWFX and MDGCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANWFX vs. MDGCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANWFX
ANWFX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
ANWFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANWFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANWFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
ANWFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANWFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

MDGCX
MDGCX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
MDGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MDGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANWFX vs. MDGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds New Perspective Fund Class F-2 (ANWFX) and BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ANWFXMDGCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.59

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

5.05

-3.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.69

23.35

-15.67

ANWFX vs. MDGCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANWFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is lower than the MDGCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANWFX and MDGCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ANWFXMDGCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

3.24

-1.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.74

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.73

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.66

-0.14

Drawdowns

ANWFX vs. MDGCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANWFX drawdown since its inception was -49.65%, roughly equal to the maximum MDGCX drawdown of -48.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANWFX and MDGCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANWFXMDGCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.65%

-48.25%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.46%

-8.07%

-3.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.90%

-21.46%

+3.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.32%

-26.68%

-7.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.32%

-34.87%

+0.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.75%

-9.93%

+2.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

1.74%

+0.97%

Volatility

ANWFX vs. MDGCX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds New Perspective Fund Class F-2 (ANWFX) and BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX) have volatilities of 3.92% and 3.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANWFXMDGCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

3.75%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.80%

10.02%

+0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.40%

12.57%

+0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.20%

16.15%

+1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.83%

17.25%

+0.58%

ANWFX vs. MDGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANWFX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than MDGCX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

ANWFX vs. MDGCX - Dividend Comparison

ANWFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.34%, less than MDGCX's 7.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANWFX
American Funds New Perspective Fund Class F-2
6.34%6.81%5.38%5.60%4.42%7.25%4.35%3.90%7.88%5.72%4.14%6.39%
MDGCX
BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.
7.44%8.91%7.78%1.42%1.75%16.75%3.77%1.73%4.06%34.82%0.65%5.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, ANWFX and MDGCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ANWFX has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to MDGCX (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANWFX dropped -49.65% vs MDGCX's -48.25%.

MDGCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANWFX and MDGCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer