ANV vs. TSYY
ANV (GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF) and TSYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ANV charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for TSYY.
Performance
ANV vs. TSYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ANV
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSYY
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- -1.25%
- YTD
- -15.64%
- 6M
- -17.72%
- 1Y
- -9.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ANV vs. TSYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ANV GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF | 6.83% |
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | -12.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANV and TSYY is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANV vs. TSYY — Risk / Return Rank
ANV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TSYY
ANV vs. TSYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF (ANV) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ANV | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.97 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.33 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.59 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ANV vs. TSYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANV drawdown since its inception was -2.82%, smaller than the maximum TSYY drawdown of -41.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANV and TSYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANV | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.82% | -41.52% | +38.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -28.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -35.97% | +35.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.64% | -26.35% | +25.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 15.95% | — |
Volatility
ANV vs. TSYY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANV | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.71% | 31.38% | -20.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.71% | 37.07% | -26.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.71% | 37.07% | -26.36% |
ANV vs. TSYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANV has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than TSYY's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
ANV vs. TSYY - Dividend Comparison
ANV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%, less than TSYY's 252.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ANV GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF | 5.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | 252.78% | 256.64% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ANV and TSYY have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ANV is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ANV is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSYY.
TSYY has the higher dividend yield at 252.78%, compared with 5.53% for ANV.
Their fees differ too: 1.07% for ANV and 1.15% for TSYY.
Find the right allocation for ANV and TSYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer