ANV vs. PAPI
ANV (GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF) and PAPI (Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. ANV charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PAPI.
Performance
ANV vs. PAPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ANV
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
PAPI
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 4.56%
- 6M
- 6.05%
- YTD
- 10.97%
- 1Y
- 15.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.32%
ANV vs. PAPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ANV GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF | 7.35% |
PAPI Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF | 3.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANV and PAPI is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANV vs. PAPI — Risk / Return Rank
ANV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PAPI
ANV vs. PAPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF (ANV) and Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ANV | PAPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.34 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.78 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ANV vs. PAPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANV drawdown since its inception was -2.82%, smaller than the maximum PAPI drawdown of -14.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANV and PAPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANV | PAPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.82% | -14.27% | +11.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | -0.69% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.59% | -2.75% | +2.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.77% | — |
Volatility
ANV vs. PAPI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANV | PAPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.30% | 10.50% | -0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.30% | 11.73% | -1.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.30% | 11.73% | -1.43% |
ANV vs. PAPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANV has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PAPI's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
ANV vs. PAPI - Dividend Comparison
ANV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.98%, less than PAPI's 7.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ANV GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF | 6.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAPI Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF | 7.38% | 7.59% | 7.07% | 1.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ANV and PAPI have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PAPI is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PAPI is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for ANV.
PAPI has the higher dividend yield at 7.38%, compared with 6.98% for ANV.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Morgan Stanley. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for ANV and 0.29% for PAPI.
Find the right allocation for ANV and PAPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer