PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANTUX vs. BGEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ANTUX vs. BGEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Non-U.S. Intrinsic Value Fund (ANTUX) and American Century Global Gold Fund (BGEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANTUX achieves a 12.60% return, which is significantly higher than BGEIX's -11.13% return.


ANTUX

1D
2.22%
1M
7.36%
6M
5.68%
YTD
12.60%
1Y
27.47%
3Y*
15.55%
5Y*
11.85%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.69%

BGEIX

1D
3.47%
1M
-2.24%
6M
-19.57%
YTD
-11.13%
1Y
48.85%
3Y*
38.61%
5Y*
18.36%
10Y*
10.13%
ALL TIME*
5.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

ANTUX vs. BGEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ANTUX
American Century Non-U.S. Intrinsic Value Fund
12.60%42.19%-2.59%22.95%-8.84%10.10%-11.38%15.84%-4.26%
BGEIX
American Century Global Gold Fund
-11.13%158.45%15.10%7.52%-12.54%-8.85%18.92%37.82%7.86%

Correlation

The correlation between ANTUX and BGEIX is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2018

0.31

The correlation between ANTUX and BGEIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANTUX vs. BGEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ANTUX
ANTUX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ANTUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANTUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANTUX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ANTUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANTUX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

BGEIX
BGEIX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
BGEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
BGEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ANTUX vs. BGEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Non-U.S. Intrinsic Value Fund (ANTUX) and American Century Global Gold Fund (BGEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ANTUXBGEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.21

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

1.30

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.10

2.88

+2.22

ANTUX vs. BGEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANTUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the BGEIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANTUX and BGEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ANTUX vs. BGEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANTUX drawdown since its inception was -44.49%, smaller than the maximum BGEIX drawdown of -78.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANTUX and BGEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANTUXBGEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.49%

-78.69%

+34.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.30%

-38.61%

+25.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.34%

-38.61%

+23.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.43%

-46.62%

+16.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-33.63%

+33.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.39%

-35.14%

+26.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.77%

17.45%

-12.68%

Volatility

ANTUX vs. BGEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Non-U.S. Intrinsic Value Fund (ANTUX) is 4.14%, while American Century Global Gold Fund (BGEIX) has a volatility of 11.67%. This indicates that ANTUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANTUXBGEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

11.67%

-7.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.54%

37.64%

-25.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.14%

45.61%

-30.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.83%

34.42%

-16.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.29%

33.49%

-13.20%

ANTUX vs. BGEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANTUX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than BGEIX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

ANTUX vs. BGEIX - Dividend Comparison

ANTUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.83%, more than BGEIX's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ANTUX
American Century Non-U.S. Intrinsic Value Fund
9.83%11.07%12.46%12.66%4.77%4.44%1.31%4.28%0.47%0.00%0.00%
BGEIX
American Century Global Gold Fund
0.91%0.85%1.36%1.56%1.38%2.13%0.56%0.87%0.00%0.00%10.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


ANTUX and BGEIX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BGEIX has higher volatility (11.67%) compared to ANTUX (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANTUX dropped -44.49% vs BGEIX's -78.69%.

ANTUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANTUX and BGEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer