PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANRJ.L vs. XDW0.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ANRJ.L vs. XDW0.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ANRJ.L is traded in GBp, while XDW0.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XDW0.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANRJ.L achieves a 27.53% return, which is significantly lower than XDW0.L's 31.44% return. Over the past 10 years, ANRJ.L has outperformed XDW0.L with an annualized return of 16.23%, while XDW0.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.25% annualized return.


ANRJ.L

1D
-0.73%
1M
-1.44%
YTD
27.53%
6M
25.69%
1Y
66.23%
3Y*
33.07%
5Y*
28.76%
10Y*
16.23%

XDW0.L

1D
-0.57%
1M
-0.95%
YTD
31.44%
6M
27.91%
1Y
48.84%
3Y*
15.80%
5Y*
20.48%
10Y*
10.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANRJ.L vs. XDW0.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ANRJ.L
Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF
27.53%43.26%10.68%9.79%44.73%26.52%-27.94%3.65%0.61%9.59%
XDW0.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C
31.44%6.49%3.89%-1.50%63.67%40.54%-32.44%5.86%-10.68%-3.77%

Correlation

The correlation between ANRJ.L and XDW0.L is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2016

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between ANRJ.L and XDW0.L has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ANRJ.L vs. XDW0.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ANRJ.L
XDW0.L

Industrials

44.4%

-

Basic Materials

25.7%

-

Utilities

20.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%

-

Technology

1.4%

-

Communication Services

-

0.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

99.9%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

ANRJ.L
44.4%
XDW0.L

-

Basic Materials

ANRJ.L
25.7%
XDW0.L

-

Utilities

ANRJ.L
20.6%
XDW0.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

ANRJ.L
7.9%
XDW0.L

-

Technology

ANRJ.L
1.4%
XDW0.L

-

Communication Services

ANRJ.L

-

XDW0.L
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

ANRJ.L

-

XDW0.L

-

Energy

ANRJ.L

-

XDW0.L
99.9%

Financial Services

ANRJ.L

-

XDW0.L

-

Healthcare

ANRJ.L

-

XDW0.L

-

Real Estate

ANRJ.L

-

XDW0.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANRJ.L vs. XDW0.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANRJ.L
ANRJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ANRJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANRJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANRJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ANRJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANRJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

XDW0.L
XDW0.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
XDW0.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANRJ.L vs. XDW0.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ANRJ.LXDW0.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.42

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.15

3.40

+4.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.14

10.88

+15.26

ANRJ.L vs. XDW0.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANRJ.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.01, which is higher than the XDW0.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANRJ.L and XDW0.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ANRJ.LXDW0.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.01

2.39

+1.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.36

0.86

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.40

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.42

+0.06

Drawdowns

ANRJ.L vs. XDW0.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANRJ.L drawdown since its inception was -57.08%, roughly equal to the maximum XDW0.L drawdown of -59.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANRJ.L and XDW0.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANRJ.LXDW0.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.08%

-59.07%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.08%

-14.30%

+6.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.17%

-21.61%

+8.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.81%

-22.02%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.08%

-59.07%

+1.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.59%

-7.68%

+4.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.86%

-13.88%

+2.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

4.48%

-1.95%

Volatility

ANRJ.L vs. XDW0.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L) is 6.93%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) has a volatility of 7.80%. This indicates that ANRJ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDW0.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANRJ.LXDW0.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.93%

7.80%

-0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.53%

17.20%

-3.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.43%

20.41%

-3.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.21%

23.73%

-2.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.69%

25.59%

-0.90%

ANRJ.L vs. XDW0.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ANRJ.L and XDW0.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ANRJ.L vs. XDW0.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ANRJ.L nor XDW0.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ANRJ.L and XDW0.L have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ANRJ.L and XDW0.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANRJ.L and XDW0.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer