ANRJ.L vs. XDW0.L
ANRJ.L (Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF) and XDW0.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C) are both Energy Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD, from Amundi and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ANRJ.L returned 16.23%/yr vs 10.25%/yr for XDW0.L. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
ANRJ.L vs. XDW0.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ANRJ.L is traded in GBp, while XDW0.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XDW0.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANRJ.L achieves a 27.53% return, which is significantly lower than XDW0.L's 31.44% return. Over the past 10 years, ANRJ.L has outperformed XDW0.L with an annualized return of 16.23%, while XDW0.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.25% annualized return.
ANRJ.L
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -1.44%
- YTD
- 27.53%
- 6M
- 25.69%
- 1Y
- 66.23%
- 3Y*
- 33.07%
- 5Y*
- 28.76%
- 10Y*
- 16.23%
XDW0.L
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -0.95%
- YTD
- 31.44%
- 6M
- 27.91%
- 1Y
- 48.84%
- 3Y*
- 15.80%
- 5Y*
- 20.48%
- 10Y*
- 10.25%
ANRJ.L vs. XDW0.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANRJ.L Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF | 27.53% | 43.26% | 10.68% | 9.79% | 44.73% | 26.52% | -27.94% | 3.65% | 0.61% | 9.59% |
XDW0.L Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C | 31.44% | 6.49% | 3.89% | -1.50% | 63.67% | 40.54% | -32.44% | 5.86% | -10.68% | -3.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANRJ.L and XDW0.L is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2016 | 0.72 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ANRJ.L and XDW0.L has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
ANRJ.L vs. XDW0.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ANRJ.L
XDW0.L
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
ANRJ.L
XDW0.L
-
Basic Materials
ANRJ.L
XDW0.L
-
Utilities
ANRJ.L
XDW0.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
ANRJ.L
XDW0.L
-
Technology
ANRJ.L
XDW0.L
-
Communication Services
ANRJ.L
-
XDW0.L
Consumer Defensive
ANRJ.L
-
XDW0.L
-
Energy
ANRJ.L
-
XDW0.L
Financial Services
ANRJ.L
-
XDW0.L
-
Healthcare
ANRJ.L
-
XDW0.L
-
Real Estate
ANRJ.L
-
XDW0.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANRJ.L vs. XDW0.L — Risk / Return Rank
ANRJ.L
XDW0.L
ANRJ.L vs. XDW0.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ANRJ.L | XDW0.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 1.42 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.15 | 3.40 | +4.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.14 | 10.88 | +15.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ANRJ.L | XDW0.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.01 | 2.39 | +1.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.36 | 0.86 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.40 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.42 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
ANRJ.L vs. XDW0.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANRJ.L drawdown since its inception was -57.08%, roughly equal to the maximum XDW0.L drawdown of -59.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANRJ.L and XDW0.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANRJ.L | XDW0.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.08% | -59.07% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.08% | -14.30% | +6.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.17% | -21.61% | +8.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.81% | -22.02% | +2.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.08% | -59.07% | +1.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.59% | -7.68% | +4.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.86% | -13.88% | +2.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 4.48% | -1.95% |
Volatility
ANRJ.L vs. XDW0.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L) is 6.93%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) has a volatility of 7.80%. This indicates that ANRJ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDW0.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANRJ.L | XDW0.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.93% | 7.80% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.53% | 17.20% | -3.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.43% | 20.41% | -3.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.21% | 23.73% | -2.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.69% | 25.59% | -0.90% |
ANRJ.L vs. XDW0.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ANRJ.L and XDW0.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ANRJ.L vs. XDW0.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ANRJ.L nor XDW0.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ANRJ.L and XDW0.L have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ANRJ.L and XDW0.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers.
Find the right allocation for ANRJ.L and XDW0.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer