PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANRJ.L vs. MWRD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ANRJ.L vs. MWRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ANRJ.L

1D
-0.73%
1M
-1.44%
YTD
27.53%
6M
25.69%
1Y
66.23%
3Y*
33.07%
5Y*
28.76%
10Y*
16.23%

MWRD.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANRJ.L vs. MWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ANRJ.L
Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF
27.53%43.26%10.68%9.79%44.73%26.52%-27.94%3.65%0.61%16.54%
MWRD.L
Amundi Index MSCI World
0.00%0.00%-1.27%17.50%-9.18%24.39%11.85%23.29%-4.10%6.52%

Correlation

The correlation between ANRJ.L and MWRD.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2017

0.41

The correlation between ANRJ.L and MWRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (3 years) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ANRJ.L vs. MWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ANRJ.L
MWRD.L

Industrials

44.4%
10.6%

Basic Materials

25.7%
3.8%

Utilities

20.6%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
10.5%

Technology

1.4%
24.7%

Communication Services

-

7.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.7%

Energy

-

4.4%

Financial Services

-

14.7%

Healthcare

-

12.4%

Real Estate

-

2.4%

Industrials

ANRJ.L
44.4%
MWRD.L
10.6%

Basic Materials

ANRJ.L
25.7%
MWRD.L
3.8%

Utilities

ANRJ.L
20.6%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

ANRJ.L
7.9%
MWRD.L
10.5%

Technology

ANRJ.L
1.4%
MWRD.L
24.7%

Communication Services

ANRJ.L

-

MWRD.L
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

ANRJ.L

-

MWRD.L
6.7%

Energy

ANRJ.L

-

MWRD.L
4.4%

Financial Services

ANRJ.L

-

MWRD.L
14.7%

Healthcare

ANRJ.L

-

MWRD.L
12.4%

Real Estate

ANRJ.L

-

MWRD.L
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANRJ.L vs. MWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANRJ.L
ANRJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ANRJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANRJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANRJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ANRJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANRJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

MWRD.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANRJ.L vs. MWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ANRJ.LMWRD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.14

ANRJ.L vs. MWRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ANRJ.LMWRD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

Drawdowns

ANRJ.L vs. MWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANRJ.LMWRD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

Volatility

ANRJ.L vs. MWRD.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANRJ.LMWRD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.69%

ANRJ.L vs. MWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANRJ.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MWRD.L's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ANRJ.L vs. MWRD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ANRJ.L nor MWRD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ANRJ.L and MWRD.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MWRD.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ANRJ.L.

ANRJ.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while MWRD.L is Global Equities. ANRJ.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while MWRD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ANRJ.L and 0.08% for MWRD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANRJ.L and MWRD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer