ANRG.TO vs. EMP-A.TO
ANRG.TO (Anaergia Inc.) and EMP-A.TO (Empire Company Limited) are both stocks. ANRG.TO operates in Waste Management (Industrials), while EMP-A.TO operates in Grocery Stores (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 3 years, ANRG.TO returned 52.29%/yr vs 13.76%/yr for EMP-A.TO. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ANRG.TO vs. EMP-A.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANRG.TO achieves a 23.45% return, which is significantly higher than EMP-A.TO's 1.96% return.
ANRG.TO
- 1D
- -2.79%
- 1M
- -7.92%
- YTD
- 23.45%
- 6M
- 17.72%
- 1Y
- 119.69%
- 3Y*
- 52.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMP-A.TO
- 1D
- 2.23%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- 1.96%
- 6M
- -3.08%
- 1Y
- -7.92%
- 3Y*
- 13.76%
- 5Y*
- 5.05%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
ANRG.TO vs. EMP-A.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANRG.TO Anaergia Inc. | 23.45% | 140.43% | 276.00% | -94.24% | -78.51% | 45.01% |
EMP-A.TO Empire Company Limited | 1.96% | 10.63% | 27.94% | 0.17% | -5.96% | -7.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANRG.TO and EMP-A.TO is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2021 | 0.03 |
The correlation between ANRG.TO and EMP-A.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ANRG.TO:
CA$478.22M
EMP-A.TO:
CA$11.05B
ANRG.TO:
CA$0.05
EMP-A.TO:
CA$0.69
ANRG.TO:
58.64
EMP-A.TO:
70.28
ANRG.TO:
2.26
EMP-A.TO:
0.35
ANRG.TO:
CA$210.55M
EMP-A.TO:
CA$31.82B
ANRG.TO:
CA$45.32M
EMP-A.TO:
CA$8.66B
ANRG.TO:
CA$2.05M
EMP-A.TO:
CA$1.66B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANRG.TO vs. EMP-A.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ANRG.TO
EMP-A.TO
ANRG.TO vs. EMP-A.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anaergia Inc. (ANRG.TO) and Empire Company Limited (EMP-A.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ANRG.TO | EMP-A.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.96 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | -0.34 | +3.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.80 | -0.58 | +7.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ANRG.TO | EMP-A.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | -0.35 | +2.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.29 | 0.45 | -0.75 |
Drawdowns
ANRG.TO vs. EMP-A.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANRG.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.17%, which is greater than EMP-A.TO's maximum drawdown of -50.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANRG.TO and EMP-A.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANRG.TO | EMP-A.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.17% | -50.93% | -48.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.66% | -23.44% | -13.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -88.38% | -23.44% | -64.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.25% | -15.44% | -73.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.18% | -11.73% | -67.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.68% | 13.68% | +4.00% |
Volatility
ANRG.TO vs. EMP-A.TO - Volatility Comparison
Anaergia Inc. (ANRG.TO) has a higher volatility of 15.69% compared to Empire Company Limited (EMP-A.TO) at 5.68%. This indicates that ANRG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMP-A.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANRG.TO | EMP-A.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.69% | 5.68% | +10.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.69% | 18.36% | +25.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.99% | 22.98% | +41.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.69% | 20.65% | +74.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 94.69% | 26.01% | +68.68% |
Dividends
ANRG.TO vs. EMP-A.TO - Dividend Comparison
ANRG.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMP-A.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANRG.TO Anaergia Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMP-A.TO Empire Company Limited | 1.83% | 1.76% | 1.75% | 1.99% | 1.77% | 1.45% | 1.44% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 1.70% | 2.58% | 1.86% |
Financials
ANRG.TO vs. EMP-A.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Anaergia Inc. and Empire Company Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ANRG.TO vs. EMP-A.TO - Profitability Comparison
ANRG.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anaergia Inc. reported a gross profit of 10.71M and revenue of 55.23M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.4%.
EMP-A.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Empire Company Limited reported a gross profit of 2.13B and revenue of 7.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.0%.
ANRG.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anaergia Inc. reported an operating income of -1.56M and revenue of 55.23M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.8%.
EMP-A.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Empire Company Limited reported an operating income of 279.00M and revenue of 7.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.5%.
ANRG.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anaergia Inc. reported a net income of -1.83M and revenue of 55.23M, resulting in a net margin of -3.3%.
EMP-A.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Empire Company Limited reported a net income of -385.00M and revenue of 7.89B, resulting in a net margin of -4.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ANRG.TO and EMP-A.TO have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ANRG.TO and EMP-A.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer