ANFGF vs. SCCO
ANFGF (Antofagasta PLC) and SCCO (Southern Copper Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Copper industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, ANFGF returned 28.87%/yr vs 27.54%/yr for SCCO. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ANFGF vs. SCCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANFGF achieves a 35.60% return, which is significantly lower than SCCO's 40.91% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ANFGF having a 28.87% annualized return and SCCO not far behind at 27.54%.
ANFGF
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 21.45%
- YTD
- 35.60%
- 6M
- 55.21%
- 1Y
- 146.64%
- 3Y*
- 50.28%
- 5Y*
- 26.36%
- 10Y*
- 28.87%
SCCO
- 1D
- -2.37%
- 1M
- 20.02%
- YTD
- 40.91%
- 6M
- 45.87%
- 1Y
- 125.81%
- 3Y*
- 47.33%
- 5Y*
- 29.16%
- 10Y*
- 27.54%
ANFGF vs. SCCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANFGF Antofagasta PLC | 35.60% | 115.53% | -2.29% | 20.04% | 10.32% | -3.80% | 65.61% | 32.34% | -29.35% | 66.53% |
SCCO Southern Copper Corporation | 40.91% | 66.62% | 9.45% | 50.12% | 4.25% | -0.62% | 58.79% | 46.59% | -33.11% | 50.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANFGF and SCCO is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016 | 0.32 |
Over the past year, ANFGF and SCCO have become more correlated (0.54) than their long-term average of 0.32, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
ANFGF:
$58.73B
SCCO:
$161.54B
ANFGF:
$2.18
SCCO:
$6.04
ANFGF:
27.37
SCCO:
32.56
ANFGF:
3.02
SCCO:
4.49
ANFGF:
3.88
SCCO:
11.11
ANFGF:
5.65
SCCO:
13.70
ANFGF:
$15.15B
SCCO:
$14.55B
ANFGF:
$6.66B
SCCO:
$6.04B
ANFGF:
$8.98B
SCCO:
$8.80B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANFGF vs. SCCO — Risk / Return Rank
ANFGF
SCCO
ANFGF vs. SCCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Antofagasta PLC (ANFGF) and Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ANFGF | SCCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.38 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.44 | 4.19 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.37 | 12.40 | +1.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ANFGF | SCCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.72 | 2.68 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.74 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.74 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.51 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
ANFGF vs. SCCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANFGF drawdown since its inception was -54.41%, smaller than the maximum SCCO drawdown of -78.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANFGF and SCCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANFGF | SCCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.41% | -78.60% | +24.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.23% | -30.22% | -3.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.92% | -39.69% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.93% | -43.07% | -4.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.41% | -54.83% | +0.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.55% | -8.80% | +6.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.85% | -22.05% | +3.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.24% | 10.19% | +0.05% |
Volatility
ANFGF vs. SCCO - Volatility Comparison
Antofagasta PLC (ANFGF) has a higher volatility of 18.73% compared to Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) at 15.08%. This indicates that ANFGF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANFGF | SCCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.73% | 15.08% | +3.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.32% | 38.66% | +6.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.31% | 47.28% | +7.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.80% | 39.47% | +9.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.32% | 37.25% | +11.07% |
Dividends
ANFGF vs. SCCO - Dividend Comparison
ANFGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than SCCO's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANFGF Antofagasta PLC | 0.81% | 1.06% | 1.53% | 2.85% | 6.83% | 3.98% | 1.53% | 3.95% | 0.00% | 1.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCCO Southern Copper Corporation | 1.86% | 2.13% | 2.29% | 4.65% | 5.80% | 5.19% | 2.30% | 4.81% | 4.55% | 1.24% | 0.56% | 1.30% |
Financials
ANFGF vs. SCCO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Antofagasta PLC and Southern Copper Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ANFGF vs. SCCO - Profitability Comparison
ANFGF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Antofagasta PLC reported a gross profit of 2.56B and revenue of 4.85B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.9%.
SCCO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Southern Copper Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ANFGF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Antofagasta PLC reported an operating income of 2.18B and revenue of 4.85B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.0%.
SCCO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Southern Copper Corporation reported an operating income of 2.48B and revenue of 4.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 58.3%.
ANFGF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Antofagasta PLC reported a net income of 812.18M and revenue of 4.85B, resulting in a net margin of 16.8%.
SCCO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Southern Copper Corporation reported a net income of 1.58B and revenue of 4.25B, resulting in a net margin of 37.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ANFGF and SCCO have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ANFGF has higher volatility (18.73%) compared to SCCO (15.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANFGF dropped -54.41% vs SCCO's -78.60%.
ANFGF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 2.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ANFGF and SCCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer