PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANFFX vs. GFFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ANFFX vs. GFFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1 (ANFFX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America (GFFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANFFX achieves a 22.83% return, which is significantly higher than GFFFX's 10.54% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ANFFX having a 16.32% annualized return and GFFFX not far behind at 16.25%.


ANFFX

1D
0.67%
1M
11.90%
YTD
22.83%
6M
25.77%
1Y
55.61%
3Y*
30.63%
5Y*
14.06%
10Y*
16.32%

GFFFX

1D
0.37%
1M
7.37%
YTD
10.54%
6M
10.81%
1Y
27.37%
3Y*
25.54%
5Y*
12.58%
10Y*
16.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANFFX vs. GFFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ANFFX
American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1
22.83%30.96%23.52%29.10%-29.69%11.98%33.43%26.38%-4.41%34.27%
GFFFX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America
10.54%19.96%28.28%37.51%-30.61%19.55%38.16%28.43%-2.96%26.38%

Correlation

The correlation between ANFFX and GFFFX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2009

0.96

The correlation between ANFFX and GFFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANFFX vs. GFFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANFFX
ANFFX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
ANFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ANFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

GFFFX
GFFFX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
GFFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
GFFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANFFX vs. GFFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1 (ANFFX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America (GFFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ANFFXGFFFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.32

1.88

+1.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.14

2.55

+1.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.34

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.24

2.06

+2.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.03

8.07

+10.96

ANFFX vs. GFFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANFFX Sharpe Ratio is 3.32, which is higher than the GFFFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANFFX and GFFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ANFFXGFFFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.32

1.88

+1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.62

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.83

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.81

-0.28

Drawdowns

ANFFX vs. GFFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANFFX drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, which is greater than GFFFX's maximum drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANFFX and GFFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANFFXGFFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.37%

-36.26%

-19.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.36%

-13.74%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.81%

-21.55%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.10%

-36.26%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.10%

-36.26%

-0.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.37%

-5.57%

-5.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

3.51%

-0.53%

Volatility

ANFFX vs. GFFFX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1 (ANFFX) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to American Funds The Growth Fund of America (GFFFX) at 3.61%. This indicates that ANFFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANFFXGFFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.27%

3.61%

+1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.72%

11.66%

+2.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.22%

15.18%

+2.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.39%

20.25%

-0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.11%

19.69%

-0.58%

ANFFX vs. GFFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANFFX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than GFFFX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

ANFFX vs. GFFFX - Dividend Comparison

ANFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.06%, less than GFFFX's 9.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANFFX
American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1
8.06%9.90%9.56%3.89%0.00%7.53%2.45%7.26%9.84%8.19%2.13%6.07%
GFFFX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America
9.90%10.95%9.23%7.64%4.32%8.42%4.51%7.38%12.29%7.27%6.87%9.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, ANFFX and GFFFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ANFFX has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to GFFFX (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANFFX dropped -55.37% vs GFFFX's -36.26%.

ANFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANFFX and GFFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer