PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANEW vs. ACSI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ANEW vs. ACSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF (ANEW) and American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ANEW vs. ACSI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ANEW
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF
-9.57%12.01%19.37%22.81%-29.62%6.95%5.77%
ACSI
American Customer Satisfaction ETF
-3.29%10.70%22.51%21.06%-20.93%23.33%10.43%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANEW achieves a -9.57% return, which is significantly lower than ACSI's -3.29% return.


ANEW

1D
2.55%
1M
-7.97%
YTD
-9.57%
6M
-11.88%
1Y
1.68%
3Y*
10.10%
5Y*
1.75%
10Y*

ACSI

1D
2.22%
1M
-4.94%
YTD
-3.29%
6M
-2.09%
1Y
9.48%
3Y*
14.24%
5Y*
7.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ANEW vs. ACSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANEW has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than ACSI's 0.66% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ANEW vs. ACSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANEW
ANEW Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
ANEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANEW Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
ANEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANEW Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

ACSI
ACSI Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
ACSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACSI Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
ACSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACSI Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANEW vs. ACSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF (ANEW) and American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ANEWACSIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.09

0.61

-0.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.27

0.98

-0.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.14

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.10

1.03

-0.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.35

4.19

-3.85

ANEW vs. ACSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANEW Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the ACSI Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANEW and ACSI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ANEWACSIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

0.61

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.45

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.68

-0.51

Correlation

The correlation between ANEW and ACSI is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ANEW vs. ACSI - Dividend Comparison

ANEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than ACSI's 0.94% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ANEW
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF
0.69%0.54%1.08%0.87%1.05%0.24%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ACSI
American Customer Satisfaction ETF
0.94%0.91%0.69%1.01%0.81%0.31%0.82%1.64%1.59%1.20%0.18%

Drawdowns

ANEW vs. ACSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANEW drawdown since its inception was -39.87%, which is greater than ACSI's maximum drawdown of -34.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANEW and ACSI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ANEWACSIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.87%

-34.49%

-5.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.12%

-9.91%

-6.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.87%

-24.86%

-15.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.98%

-5.67%

-8.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.56%

-5.47%

-8.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.83%

2.43%

+2.40%

Volatility

ANEW vs. ACSI - Volatility Comparison

ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF (ANEW) has a higher volatility of 5.53% compared to American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) at 4.72%. This indicates that ANEW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ANEWACSIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.53%

4.72%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.29%

8.54%

+1.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.55%

15.67%

+2.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.85%

16.66%

+2.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.95%

17.50%

+1.45%