PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANET vs. NEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ANET vs. NEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANET achieves a 24.58% return, which is significantly higher than NEM's 0.82% return. Over the past 10 years, ANET has outperformed NEM with an annualized return of 43.12%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively lower 13.80% annualized return.


ANET

1D
4.37%
1M
16.03%
YTD
24.58%
6M
30.84%
1Y
70.45%
3Y*
57.04%
5Y*
48.31%
10Y*
43.12%

NEM

1D
2.71%
1M
-15.55%
YTD
0.82%
6M
2.58%
1Y
81.14%
3Y*
36.14%
5Y*
10.51%
10Y*
13.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANET vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
24.58%18.55%87.73%94.07%-15.58%97.89%42.86%-3.46%-10.56%143.44%
NEM
Newmont Corporation
0.82%172.82%-7.83%-8.76%-20.77%7.40%40.28%30.52%-6.15%10.91%

Correlation

The correlation between ANET and NEM is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2014

0.12

The correlation between ANET and NEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

ANET:

$2.92

NEM:

$6.34

PE Ratio

ANET:

55.91

NEM:

15.82

PEG Ratio

ANET:

1.31

NEM:

0.41

PS Ratio

ANET:

21.42

NEM:

4.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

ANET:

$9.71B

NEM:

$17.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ANET:

$6.17B

NEM:

$8.97B

EBITDA (TTM)

ANET:

$4.21B

NEM:

$13.78B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANET vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANET
ANET Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ANET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANET Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANET Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ANET Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANET Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

NEM
NEM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
NEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
NEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANET vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ANETNEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.29

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

2.78

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.20

7.58

-2.39

ANET vs. NEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANET Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the NEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANET and NEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ANET vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANET drawdown since its inception was -52.20%, smaller than the maximum NEM drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANET and NEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANETNEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.20%

-81.30%

+29.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.33%

-29.39%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.42%

-36.57%

-13.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.42%

-62.40%

+11.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.20%

-62.40%

+10.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.15%

-23.71%

+15.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.39%

-41.37%

+25.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.60%

10.73%

+2.87%

Volatility

ANET vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison

Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) has a higher volatility of 16.62% compared to Newmont Corporation (NEM) at 15.74%. This indicates that ANET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANETNEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.62%

15.74%

+0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.79%

37.43%

+3.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.57%

47.44%

+6.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.23%

37.99%

+9.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.00%

35.67%

+9.33%

Dividends

ANET vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison

ANET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NEM
Newmont Corporation
1.02%1.00%2.69%3.87%4.66%3.55%1.74%3.31%1.62%0.67%0.37%0.56%

Financials

ANET vs. NEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arista Networks, Inc. and Newmont Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20222023202420252026
2.71B
0
(ANET) Total Revenue
(NEM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ANET and NEM have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ANET has higher volatility (16.62%) compared to NEM (15.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANET dropped -52.20% vs NEM's -81.30%.

NEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANET and NEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer