PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANET vs. MRVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ANET vs. MRVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANET achieves a 33.22% return, which is significantly lower than MRVL's 262.72% return. Over the past 10 years, ANET has outperformed MRVL with an annualized return of 45.29%, while MRVL has yielded a comparatively lower 42.22% annualized return.


ANET

1D
2.88%
1M
13.33%
YTD
33.22%
6M
33.53%
1Y
102.39%
3Y*
67.41%
5Y*
50.26%
10Y*
45.29%

MRVL

1D
-0.88%
1M
56.81%
YTD
262.72%
6M
263.49%
1Y
319.93%
3Y*
75.20%
5Y*
41.91%
10Y*
42.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANET vs. MRVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
33.22%18.55%87.73%94.07%-15.58%97.89%42.86%-3.46%-10.56%143.44%
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
262.72%-22.82%83.79%63.68%-57.48%84.62%80.25%65.74%-23.62%56.89%

Correlation

The correlation between ANET and MRVL is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2014

0.48

The correlation between ANET and MRVL shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ANET:

$222.35B

MRVL:

$275.01B

EPS

ANET:

$2.92

MRVL:

$2.90

PE Ratio

ANET:

59.79

MRVL:

106.30

PEG Ratio

ANET:

1.40

MRVL:

0.19

PS Ratio

ANET:

22.91

MRVL:

30.81

PB Ratio

ANET:

16.49

MRVL:

15.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

ANET:

$9.71B

MRVL:

$8.72B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ANET:

$6.17B

MRVL:

$4.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

ANET:

$4.21B

MRVL:

$4.27B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANET vs. MRVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANET
ANET Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ANET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANET Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANET Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ANET Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANET Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

MRVL
MRVL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
MRVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRVL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
MRVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRVL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANET vs. MRVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ANETMRVLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.56

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

12.23

-8.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.56

27.84

-20.28

ANET vs. MRVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANET Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is lower than the MRVL Sharpe Ratio of 4.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANET and MRVL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ANET vs. MRVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANET drawdown since its inception was -52.20%, smaller than the maximum MRVL drawdown of -91.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANET and MRVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANETMRVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.20%

-91.60%

+39.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.33%

-26.36%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.42%

-60.79%

+10.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.42%

-61.88%

+11.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.20%

-61.88%

+9.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

-2.71%

+0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.37%

-46.71%

+31.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.59%

11.56%

+2.03%

Volatility

ANET vs. MRVL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) is 15.95%, while Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) has a volatility of 42.61%. This indicates that ANET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANETMRVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.95%

42.61%

-26.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.27%

56.98%

-16.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.18%

72.31%

-19.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.31%

62.28%

-14.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.04%

52.20%

-7.16%

Dividends

ANET vs. MRVL - Dividend Comparison

ANET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MRVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
0.08%0.28%0.22%0.40%0.65%0.21%0.50%0.90%1.48%1.12%1.73%2.72%

Financials

ANET vs. MRVL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arista Networks, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
2.71B
2.42B
(ANET) Total Revenue
(MRVL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ANET vs. MRVL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Arista Networks, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
61.9%
52.2%
Portfolio components
ANET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.68B and revenue of 2.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.9%.

MRVL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 2.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.

ANET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.7%.

MRVL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 339.40M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.

ANET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in a net margin of 37.8%.

MRVL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 34.50M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ANET and MRVL have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRVL has higher volatility (42.61%) compared to ANET (15.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANET dropped -52.20% vs MRVL's -91.60%.

MRVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.47 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANET and MRVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer