ANEL vs. PLTG
ANEL (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ANET ETF) and PLTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ANEL charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PLTG.
Performance
ANEL vs. PLTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANEL achieves a 41.13% return, which is significantly higher than PLTG's -63.05% return.
ANEL
- 1D
- 11.82%
- 1M
- 21.44%
- 6M
- 24.42%
- YTD
- 41.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
PLTG
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- -11.61%
- 6M
- -44.23%
- YTD
- -63.05%
- 1Y
- -58.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -21.05%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $872.88K | $2.81M | $5.68M | |
| $2.36M | $3.34M | $5.05M |
ANEL vs. PLTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ANEL Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ANET ETF | 41.13% | -22.70% |
PLTG Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF | -63.05% | 15.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANEL and PLTG is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANEL vs. PLTG — Risk / Return Rank
ANEL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PLTG
ANEL vs. PLTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ANET ETF (ANEL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ANEL | PLTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.94 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.76 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.23 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ANEL vs. PLTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANEL drawdown since its inception was -56.57%, smaller than the maximum PLTG drawdown of -80.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANEL and PLTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANEL | PLTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.57% | -80.11% | +23.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -80.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.74% | -74.89% | +62.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.34% | -35.51% | +8.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 49.28% | — |
Volatility
ANEL vs. PLTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANEL | PLTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 27.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 82.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 110.69% | 104.68% | +6.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 110.69% | 105.88% | +4.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 110.69% | 105.88% | +4.81% |
ANEL vs. PLTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANEL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ANEL vs. PLTG - Dividend Comparison
ANEL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PLTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ANEL Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ANET ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PLTG Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF | 49.09% | 18.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ANEL and PLTG have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PLTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PLTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for ANEL.
PLTG has the higher dividend yield at 49.09%, compared with 0.00% for ANEL.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for ANEL and 0.75% for PLTG.
Find the right allocation for ANEL and PLTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer