ANEL vs. INTW
ANEL (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ANET ETF) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ANEL charges 1.31%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.
Performance
ANEL vs. INTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANEL achieves a 25.29% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 332.72% return.
ANEL
- 1D
- -4.20%
- 1M
- -4.52%
- 6M
- 28.38%
- YTD
- 25.29%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INTW
- 1D
- -11.89%
- 1M
- -36.23%
- 6M
- 160.20%
- YTD
- 332.72%
- 1Y
- 833.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ANEL vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ANEL Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ANET ETF | 25.29% | -22.70% |
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | 332.72% | 103.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANEL and INTW is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANEL vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank
ANEL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
INTW
ANEL vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ANET ETF (ANEL) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ANEL | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.48 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 15.18 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 36.20 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ANEL vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANEL drawdown since its inception was -56.57%, smaller than the maximum INTW drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANEL and INTW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANEL | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.57% | -60.58% | +4.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -55.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.53% | -55.46% | +32.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.71% | -29.73% | +2.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 23.21% | — |
Volatility
ANEL vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANEL | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 52.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 123.38% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 110.15% | 154.09% | -43.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 110.15% | 149.56% | -39.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 110.15% | 149.56% | -39.41% |
ANEL vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANEL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ANEL vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison
Neither ANEL nor INTW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ANEL and INTW have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ANEL is cheaper at 1.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ANEL is cheaper with a 1.31% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.
ANEL and INTW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for ANEL and 1.50% for INTW.
Find the right allocation for ANEL and INTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer