PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANEL vs. CRMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ANEL vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ANET ETF (ANEL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANEL achieves a 11.46% return, which is significantly higher than CRMG's -57.62% return.


ANEL

1D
-14.54%
1M
4.58%
YTD
11.46%
6M
13.84%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CRMG

1D
-3.49%
1M
0.69%
YTD
-57.62%
6M
-56.45%
1Y
-62.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANEL vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ANEL and CRMG is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2025

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANEL vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANEL

CRMG
CRMG Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
CRMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRMG Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
CRMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRMG Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANEL vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ANET ETF (ANEL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ANEL vs. CRMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ANELCRMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.17

-0.67

+0.50

Drawdowns

ANEL vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANEL drawdown since its inception was -56.57%, smaller than the maximum CRMG drawdown of -74.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANEL and CRMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANELCRMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.57%

-74.38%

+17.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-70.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.09%

-68.99%

+37.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.91%

-37.92%

+9.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.28%

Volatility

ANEL vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANELCRMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

63.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

108.52%

75.38%

+33.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

108.52%

75.55%

+32.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

108.52%

75.55%

+32.97%

ANEL vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANEL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

ANEL vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison

Neither ANEL nor CRMG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ANEL and CRMG have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for ANEL.

ANEL and CRMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for ANEL and 0.75% for CRMG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANEL and CRMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer