ANCFX vs. CWBFX
Compare and contrast key facts about American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A (ANCFX) and American Funds Capital World Bond Fund (CWBFX).
ANCFX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on Jan 8, 1978. CWBFX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on Aug 3, 1987.
Performance
ANCFX vs. CWBFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ANCFX vs. CWBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANCFX American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A | -6.13% | 24.21% | 22.73% | 25.86% | -16.66% | 22.43% | 14.92% | 27.07% | -8.13% | 22.80% |
CWBFX American Funds Capital World Bond Fund | -2.63% | 7.78% | -3.25% | 5.81% | -17.52% | -5.17% | 9.91% | 7.66% | -1.81% | 7.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANCFX achieves a -6.13% return, which is significantly lower than CWBFX's -2.63% return. Over the past 10 years, ANCFX has outperformed CWBFX with an annualized return of 12.92%, while CWBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.15% annualized return.
ANCFX
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -9.88%
- YTD
- -6.13%
- 6M
- -2.09%
- 1Y
- 20.46%
- 3Y*
- 19.35%
- 5Y*
- 11.57%
- 10Y*
- 12.92%
CWBFX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -4.32%
- YTD
- -2.63%
- 6M
- -2.45%
- 1Y
- 1.95%
- 3Y*
- 1.50%
- 5Y*
- -2.49%
- 10Y*
- 0.15%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ANCFX vs. CWBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANCFX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CWBFX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ANCFX vs. CWBFX — Risk / Return Rank
ANCFX
CWBFX
ANCFX vs. CWBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A (ANCFX) and American Funds Capital World Bond Fund (CWBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ANCFX | CWBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 0.37 | +0.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.75 | 0.56 | +1.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.07 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 0.58 | +1.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.19 | 2.05 | +5.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ANCFX | CWBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 0.37 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | -0.38 | +1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.03 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.85 | -0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between ANCFX and CWBFX is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ANCFX vs. CWBFX - Dividend Comparison
ANCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.11%, more than CWBFX's 2.84% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANCFX American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A | 9.11% | 8.54% | 8.90% | 5.80% | 4.98% | 10.97% | 2.61% | 6.91% | 9.31% | 7.28% | 4.71% | 6.08% |
CWBFX American Funds Capital World Bond Fund | 2.84% | 2.68% | 3.01% | 2.47% | 1.99% | 2.63% | 3.18% | 2.26% | 1.87% | 1.80% | 2.05% | 0.58% |
Drawdowns
ANCFX vs. CWBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANCFX drawdown since its inception was -53.29%, which is greater than CWBFX's maximum drawdown of -27.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANCFX and CWBFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANCFX | CWBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.29% | -27.91% | -25.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.35% | -4.45% | -6.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.07% | -26.34% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.93% | -27.91% | -6.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.66% | -16.19% | +5.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.34% | -4.14% | -3.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.54% | 1.26% | +1.28% |
Volatility
ANCFX vs. CWBFX - Volatility Comparison
American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A (ANCFX) has a higher volatility of 4.98% compared to American Funds Capital World Bond Fund (CWBFX) at 2.04%. This indicates that ANCFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CWBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ANCFX | CWBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.98% | 2.04% | +2.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.64% | 3.10% | +7.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.94% | 5.48% | +12.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.67% | 6.49% | +10.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 5.63% | +12.02% |