PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANCFX vs. AIVSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ANCFX vs. AIVSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A (ANCFX) and American Funds Investment Company of America Class A (AIVSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANCFX achieves a 15.14% return, which is significantly higher than AIVSX's 10.91% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ANCFX having a 14.90% annualized return and AIVSX not far behind at 14.27%.


ANCFX

1D
0.00%
1M
5.89%
YTD
15.14%
6M
16.14%
1Y
34.54%
3Y*
26.09%
5Y*
14.91%
10Y*
14.90%

AIVSX

1D
0.00%
1M
5.17%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.87%
1Y
26.68%
3Y*
24.21%
5Y*
15.03%
10Y*
14.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANCFX vs. AIVSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ANCFX
American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A
15.14%24.21%22.73%25.86%-16.66%22.43%14.92%27.07%-8.13%22.80%
AIVSX
American Funds Investment Company of America Class A
10.91%20.47%24.90%28.56%-15.50%25.10%14.47%24.10%-8.21%19.54%

Correlation

The correlation between ANCFX and AIVSX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1990

0.96

The correlation between ANCFX and AIVSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANCFX vs. AIVSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANCFX
ANCFX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ANCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ANCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

AIVSX
AIVSX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
AIVSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIVSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIVSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
AIVSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIVSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANCFX vs. AIVSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A (ANCFX) and American Funds Investment Company of America Class A (AIVSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ANCFXAIVSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.40

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

2.73

+0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.41

12.38

+3.03

ANCFX vs. AIVSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANCFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the AIVSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANCFX and AIVSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ANCFXAIVSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

2.21

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.94

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.86

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.70

-0.06

Drawdowns

ANCFX vs. AIVSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANCFX drawdown since its inception was -53.29%, roughly equal to the maximum AIVSX drawdown of -50.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANCFX and AIVSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANCFXAIVSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.29%

-50.90%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.66%

-10.08%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.97%

-17.40%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.07%

-24.31%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.93%

-31.09%

-2.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.32%

-5.91%

-1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

2.22%

+0.08%

Volatility

ANCFX vs. AIVSX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A (ANCFX) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to American Funds Investment Company of America Class A (AIVSX) at 3.26%. This indicates that ANCFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIVSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANCFXAIVSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

3.26%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.82%

9.72%

+1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.75%

12.46%

+1.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.80%

16.00%

+0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.73%

16.58%

+1.15%

ANCFX vs. AIVSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANCFX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than AIVSX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

ANCFX vs. AIVSX - Dividend Comparison

ANCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.43%, less than AIVSX's 9.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIVSX
American Funds Investment Company of America Class A
9.58%10.60%9.29%4.96%6.12%6.94%1.65%6.15%9.61%7.08%5.48%8.95%
ANCFX
American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A
7.43%8.54%8.90%5.80%4.98%10.97%2.61%6.91%9.31%7.28%4.71%6.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, ANCFX and AIVSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ANCFX has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to AIVSX (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANCFX dropped -53.29% vs AIVSX's -50.90%.

ANCFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANCFX and AIVSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer