ANBIX vs. IPBAX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

ANBIX (AB Bond Inflation Strategy) and IPBAX (Allspring Real Return Fund) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, ANBIX returned 3.65%/yr vs 5.09%/yr for IPBAX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ANBIX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for IPBAX.

Performance

ANBIX vs. IPBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Bond Inflation Strategy (ANBIX) and Allspring Real Return Fund (IPBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANBIX achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly lower than IPBAX's 15.06% return. Over the past 10 years, ANBIX has underperformed IPBAX with an annualized return of 3.65%, while IPBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.09% annualized return.

ANBIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.02%
• YTD: 1.61%
• 6M: 1.71%
• 1Y: 4.50%
• 3Y*: 5.16%
• 5Y*: 2.35%
• 10Y*: 3.65%

IPBAX

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 1.85%
• YTD: 15.06%
• 6M: 15.69%
• 1Y: 23.25%
• 3Y*: 12.28%
• 5Y*: 6.24%
• 10Y*: 5.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANBIX vs. IPBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ANBIX AB Bond Inflation Strategy	1.61%	7.52%	3.20%	5.20%	-8.50%	6.35%	9.35%	9.29%	-0.76%	2.93%
IPBAX Allspring Real Return Fund	15.06%	10.37%	8.12%	5.35%	-10.75%	7.74%	8.03%	9.87%	-4.02%	4.07%

Correlation

The correlation between ANBIX and IPBAX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2010	0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between ANBIX and IPBAX has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

ANBIX vs. IPBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANBIX

ANBIX Risk / Return Rank: 70
ANBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
ANBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
ANBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
ANBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
ANBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

IPBAX

IPBAX Risk / Return Rank: 92
IPBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
IPBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
IPBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
IPBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
IPBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANBIX vs. IPBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Bond Inflation Strategy (ANBIX) and Allspring Real Return Fund (IPBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ANBIX	IPBAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	3.14	-1.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	4.37	-0.96
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.58	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.37	6.30	-1.93
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.45	24.70	-8.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ANBIX vs. IPBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANBIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is lower than the IPBAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANBIX and IPBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ANBIX	IPBAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.10	3.14	-1.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	0.87	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91	0.85	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	0.71	+0.15

Drawdowns

ANBIX vs. IPBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANBIX drawdown since its inception was -11.56%, smaller than the maximum IPBAX drawdown of -15.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANBIX and IPBAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ANBIX	IPBAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.56%	-15.13%	+3.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.05%	-3.84%	+2.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.52%	-5.58%	+3.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.85%	-13.94%	+3.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-11.56%	-13.94%	+2.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.20%	-3.13%	+0.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.28%	0.98%	-0.70%

Volatility

ANBIX vs. IPBAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Bond Inflation Strategy (ANBIX) is 0.61%, while Allspring Real Return Fund (IPBAX) has a volatility of 2.34%. This indicates that ANBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ANBIX	IPBAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.61%	2.34%	-1.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.44%	6.00%	-4.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.11%	7.69%	-5.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.49%	7.20%	-2.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.01%	5.98%	-1.97%

ANBIX vs. IPBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANBIX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than IPBAX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

ANBIX vs. IPBAX - Dividend Comparison

ANBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, more than IPBAX's 2.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ANBIX AB Bond Inflation Strategy	3.73%	4.93%	3.86%	4.55%	6.47%	4.70%	2.22%	3.19%	3.39%	2.05%	2.13%	1.61%
IPBAX Allspring Real Return Fund	2.27%	2.58%	2.26%	3.71%	5.07%	3.84%	1.26%	2.12%	2.57%	1.96%	1.77%	2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ANBIX and IPBAX in my portfolio?

ANBIX and IPBAX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ANBIX or IPBAX?

IPBAX has higher volatility (2.34%) compared to ANBIX (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANBIX dropped -11.56% vs IPBAX's -15.13%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IPBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.