PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANBAX vs. RERGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ANBAX vs. RERGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Strategic Bond Fund (ANBAX) and American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6 (RERGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANBAX achieves a -0.70% return, which is significantly lower than RERGX's 12.33% return.


ANBAX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.55%
YTD
-0.70%
6M
-0.81%
1Y
2.65%
3Y*
2.12%
5Y*
-0.97%
10Y*

RERGX

1D
0.55%
1M
6.76%
YTD
12.33%
6M
15.06%
1Y
29.41%
3Y*
16.36%
5Y*
5.37%
10Y*
9.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANBAX vs. RERGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ANBAX
American Funds Strategic Bond Fund
-0.70%7.18%-0.61%1.52%-12.74%-1.13%18.10%7.83%0.28%2.97%
RERGX
American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6
12.33%29.34%3.00%16.11%-22.77%2.84%25.27%27.40%-17.33%30.58%

Correlation

The correlation between ANBAX and RERGX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.02

Over the past year, ANBAX and RERGX have become more correlated (0.33) than their long-term average of 0.02, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANBAX vs. RERGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANBAX
ANBAX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
ANBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
ANBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

RERGX
RERGX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
RERGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RERGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
RERGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
RERGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
RERGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANBAX vs. RERGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Strategic Bond Fund (ANBAX) and American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6 (RERGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ANBAXRERGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.35

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

2.32

-1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.01

8.74

-6.73

ANBAX vs. RERGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANBAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the RERGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANBAX and RERGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ANBAXRERGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

1.89

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

0.32

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.43

-0.03

Drawdowns

ANBAX vs. RERGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANBAX drawdown since its inception was -19.33%, smaller than the maximum RERGX drawdown of -37.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANBAX and RERGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANBAXRERGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.33%

-37.30%

+17.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.96%

-12.52%

+8.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.21%

-15.62%

+8.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.33%

-37.30%

+17.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.60%

0.00%

-7.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.69%

-9.21%

+3.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.32%

3.31%

-1.99%

Volatility

ANBAX vs. RERGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Strategic Bond Fund (ANBAX) is 1.52%, while American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6 (RERGX) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that ANBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RERGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANBAXRERGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.52%

5.40%

-3.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.05%

12.91%

-9.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.32%

15.38%

-11.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.31%

16.67%

-10.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.41%

16.93%

-11.52%

ANBAX vs. RERGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANBAX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than RERGX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

ANBAX vs. RERGX - Dividend Comparison

ANBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, less than RERGX's 12.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANBAX
American Funds Strategic Bond Fund
3.00%2.78%3.07%2.91%5.31%1.74%3.87%3.09%3.51%1.76%0.00%0.00%
RERGX
American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6
12.42%13.95%4.96%3.95%2.02%10.19%0.41%3.14%3.17%4.99%1.64%3.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


ANBAX and RERGX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RERGX has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to ANBAX (1.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANBAX dropped -19.33% vs RERGX's -37.30%.

RERGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANBAX and RERGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer