ANBAX vs. FFHCX
ANBAX (American Funds Strategic Bond Fund) and FFHCX (Fidelity Series Floating Rate High Income Fund) are both mutual funds - ANBAX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by American Funds, while FFHCX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, ANBAX returned -1.01%/yr vs 6.16%/yr for FFHCX. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ANBAX charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FFHCX.
Performance
ANBAX vs. FFHCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANBAX achieves a -0.81% return, which is significantly lower than FFHCX's 2.34% return.
ANBAX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- -0.81%
- 6M
- -0.70%
- 1Y
- 2.54%
- 3Y*
- 2.08%
- 5Y*
- -1.01%
- 10Y*
- —
FFHCX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 2.34%
- 6M
- 2.99%
- 1Y
- 6.86%
- 3Y*
- 8.52%
- 5Y*
- 6.16%
- 10Y*
- 5.71%
ANBAX vs. FFHCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANBAX American Funds Strategic Bond Fund | -0.81% | 7.18% | -0.61% | 1.52% | -12.74% | -1.13% | 18.10% | 7.83% | 0.28% | 2.97% |
FFHCX Fidelity Series Floating Rate High Income Fund | 2.34% | 6.02% | 8.49% | 13.19% | -1.55% | 5.66% | 2.54% | 9.42% | 1.36% | 4.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANBAX and FFHCX is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANBAX vs. FFHCX — Risk / Return Rank
ANBAX
FFHCX
ANBAX vs. FFHCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Strategic Bond Fund (ANBAX) and Fidelity Series Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFHCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ANBAX | FFHCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.54 | 2.66 | -2.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.78 | 6.81 | -6.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 2.04 | -0.94 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 6.66 | -6.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.93 | 24.90 | -22.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ANBAX | FFHCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | 2.66 | -2.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | 2.00 | -2.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 1.40 | -1.01 |
Drawdowns
ANBAX vs. FFHCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANBAX drawdown since its inception was -19.33%, smaller than the maximum FFHCX drawdown of -21.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANBAX and FFHCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANBAX | FFHCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.33% | -21.45% | +2.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.96% | -1.14% | -2.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.21% | -3.12% | -4.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.33% | -5.81% | -13.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.70% | 0.00% | -7.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.69% | -0.93% | -4.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.32% | 0.31% | +1.01% |
Volatility
ANBAX vs. FFHCX - Volatility Comparison
American Funds Strategic Bond Fund (ANBAX) has a higher volatility of 1.53% compared to Fidelity Series Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFHCX) at 0.67%. This indicates that ANBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFHCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANBAX | FFHCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.53% | 0.67% | +0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.04% | 1.96% | +1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.33% | 2.60% | +1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.31% | 3.09% | +3.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.41% | 4.17% | +1.24% |
ANBAX vs. FFHCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANBAX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than FFHCX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
ANBAX vs. FFHCX - Dividend Comparison
ANBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, less than FFHCX's 7.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANBAX American Funds Strategic Bond Fund | 3.00% | 2.78% | 3.07% | 2.91% | 5.31% | 1.74% | 3.87% | 3.09% | 3.51% | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FFHCX Fidelity Series Floating Rate High Income Fund | 7.67% | 8.11% | 8.46% | 9.47% | 3.83% | 3.64% | 4.61% | 5.92% | 6.68% | 4.80% | 5.16% | 4.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ANBAX and FFHCX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ANBAX has higher volatility (1.53%) compared to FFHCX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANBAX dropped -19.33% vs FFHCX's -21.45%.
FFHCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ANBAX and FFHCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer