PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANAZX vs. EAIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ANAZX vs. EAIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Global Bond Fund Class Z (ANAZX) and Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund (EAIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANAZX achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly lower than EAIIX's 3.60% return. Over the past 10 years, ANAZX has underperformed EAIIX with an annualized return of 1.75%, while EAIIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.70% annualized return.


ANAZX

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.50%
YTD
0.58%
6M
0.77%
1Y
3.21%
3Y*
4.69%
5Y*
0.35%
10Y*
1.75%

EAIIX

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.07%
YTD
3.60%
6M
4.65%
1Y
9.75%
3Y*
6.59%
5Y*
1.03%
10Y*
2.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANAZX vs. EAIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ANAZX
AB Global Bond Fund Class Z
0.58%6.42%2.70%5.99%-12.17%-2.14%5.13%7.84%0.38%3.18%
EAIIX
Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund
3.60%13.67%-2.81%8.45%-11.29%-5.71%9.33%6.09%-2.67%10.58%

Correlation

The correlation between ANAZX and EAIIX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2013

0.35

The correlation between ANAZX and EAIIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.64 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANAZX vs. EAIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANAZX
ANAZX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
ANAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
ANAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

EAIIX
EAIIX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
EAIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
EAIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANAZX vs. EAIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Global Bond Fund Class Z (ANAZX) and Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund (EAIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ANAZXEAIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.66

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

4.49

-3.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.63

16.86

-13.23

ANAZX vs. EAIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANAZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the EAIIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANAZX and EAIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ANAZXEAIIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

3.16

-2.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.16

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.49

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.55

+0.13

Drawdowns

ANAZX vs. EAIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANAZX drawdown since its inception was -17.24%, smaller than the maximum EAIIX drawdown of -25.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANAZX and EAIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANAZXEAIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.24%

-25.32%

+8.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.12%

-2.33%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.00%

-8.35%

+4.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.24%

-24.13%

+6.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.24%

-25.32%

+8.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

-0.66%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.39%

-5.04%

+1.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

0.62%

+0.35%

Volatility

ANAZX vs. EAIIX - Volatility Comparison

AB Global Bond Fund Class Z (ANAZX) has a higher volatility of 1.45% compared to Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund (EAIIX) at 0.88%. This indicates that ANAZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANAZXEAIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.45%

0.88%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.80%

2.44%

+0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.34%

3.32%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.46%

6.55%

-2.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.77%

5.51%

-1.74%

ANAZX vs. EAIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANAZX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than EAIIX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

ANAZX vs. EAIIX - Dividend Comparison

ANAZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, less than EAIIX's 8.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANAZX
AB Global Bond Fund Class Z
3.76%4.89%3.67%2.53%8.39%2.73%2.64%3.71%3.17%2.53%3.27%4.06%
EAIIX
Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund
8.76%7.44%4.80%4.42%4.54%5.37%6.13%5.69%4.70%4.43%5.53%5.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


ANAZX and EAIIX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ANAZX has higher volatility (1.45%) compared to EAIIX (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANAZX dropped -17.24% vs EAIIX's -25.32%.

EAIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANAZX and EAIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer