ANAU.DE vs. FTGQ.DE
ANAU.DE (AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc) and FTGQ.DE (First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. ANAU.DE is passively managed, while FTGQ.DE is actively managed. Over the past year, ANAU.DE returned 39.48% vs 18.15% for FTGQ.DE. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ANAU.DE charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for FTGQ.DE.
Performance
ANAU.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ANAU.DE is traded in USD, while FTGQ.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the FTGQ.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANAU.DE achieves a 19.26% return, which is significantly higher than FTGQ.DE's 6.37% return.
ANAU.DE
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 6.81%
- YTD
- 19.26%
- 6M
- 18.67%
- 1Y
- 39.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTGQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 2.11%
- YTD
- 6.37%
- 6M
- 7.47%
- 1Y
- 18.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ANAU.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ANAU.DE AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 19.26% | 20.55% | -0.50% |
FTGQ.DE First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation | 6.35% | 14.08% | -3.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANAU.DE and FTGQ.DE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2024 | 0.66 |
The correlation between ANAU.DE and FTGQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANAU.DE vs. FTGQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ANAU.DE
FTGQ.DE
ANAU.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc (ANAU.DE) and First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation (FTGQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ANAU.DE | FTGQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.41 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.71 | 3.15 | +0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.31 | 13.01 | +0.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ANAU.DE | FTGQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 2.27 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.60 | 0.92 | +0.68 |
Drawdowns
ANAU.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANAU.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.35%, which is greater than FTGQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -12.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANAU.DE and FTGQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANAU.DE | FTGQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.35% | -12.57% | -9.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.88% | -5.74% | -5.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -0.19% | -0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.96% | -2.15% | -0.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 1.39% | +1.65% |
Volatility
ANAU.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc (ANAU.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation (FTGQ.DE) at 1.34%. This indicates that ANAU.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTGQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANAU.DE | FTGQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.75% | 1.34% | +3.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.91% | 5.16% | +6.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.96% | 7.96% | +8.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.40% | 12.33% | +6.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.40% | 12.33% | +6.07% |
ANAU.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANAU.DE has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than FTGQ.DE's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
ANAU.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ANAU.DE nor FTGQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ANAU.DE and FTGQ.DE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ANAU.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ANAU.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for FTGQ.DE.
They also come from different issuers: AXA IM and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for ANAU.DE and 0.90% for FTGQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for ANAU.DE and FTGQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer