AMZZ vs. SOXL
AMZZ (GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF) and SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. AMZZ is actively managed, while SOXL is passively managed. Over the past year, AMZZ returned 6.71% vs 976.09% for SOXL. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMZZ charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SOXL.
Performance
AMZZ vs. SOXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZZ achieves a -4.99% return, which is significantly lower than SOXL's 450.61% return.
AMZZ
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -24.11%
- YTD
- -4.99%
- 6M
- -5.95%
- 1Y
- 6.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOXL
- 1D
- -23.06%
- 1M
- 21.44%
- YTD
- 450.61%
- 6M
- 429.57%
- 1Y
- 976.09%
- 3Y*
- 120.84%
- 5Y*
- 42.16%
- 10Y*
- 64.56%
AMZZ vs. SOXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AMZZ GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF | -4.99% | -8.94% | 34.95% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 450.61% | 54.91% | -35.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZZ and SOXL is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2024 | 0.47 |
AMZZ vs. SOXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMZZ
SOXL
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
AMZZ
SOXL
-
Basic Materials
AMZZ
-
SOXL
-
Communication Services
AMZZ
-
SOXL
-
Consumer Defensive
AMZZ
-
SOXL
-
Energy
AMZZ
-
SOXL
-
Financial Services
AMZZ
-
SOXL
-
Healthcare
AMZZ
-
SOXL
-
Industrials
AMZZ
-
SOXL
-
Real Estate
AMZZ
-
SOXL
-
Technology
AMZZ
-
SOXL
Utilities
AMZZ
-
SOXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZZ vs. SOXL — Risk / Return Rank
AMZZ
SOXL
AMZZ vs. SOXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF (AMZZ) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMZZ | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -8.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.58 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 22.69 | -22.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.35 | 72.83 | -72.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMZZ vs. SOXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZZ drawdown since its inception was -55.28%, smaller than the maximum SOXL drawdown of -90.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZZ and SOXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZZ | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.28% | -90.46% | +35.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.97% | -43.47% | +1.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -87.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -90.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -90.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.83% | -23.06% | -5.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.25% | -34.95% | +14.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.23% | 13.52% | +5.71% |
Volatility
AMZZ vs. SOXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF (AMZZ) is 20.12%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a volatility of 68.39%. This indicates that AMZZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZZ | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.12% | 68.39% | -48.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.07% | 99.84% | -56.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.33% | 116.79% | -55.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.09% | 110.35% | -47.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.09% | 100.62% | -37.53% |
AMZZ vs. SOXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZZ has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXL's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZZ vs. SOXL - Dividend Comparison
AMZZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SOXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZZ GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 0.03% | 0.34% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 1.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.38% | 1.30% | 0.09% | 4.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZZ and SOXL have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXL has higher volatility (68.39%) compared to AMZZ (20.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZZ dropped -55.28% vs SOXL's -90.46%.
On 1-year performance, SOXL leads with 976.09% vs 6.71% for AMZZ. On fees, SOXL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, AMZZ has been the lower-risk option at 20.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SOXL has performed better with a 976.09% return vs 6.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for AMZZ.
SOXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.00% for AMZZ.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for AMZZ and 0.75% for SOXL.
SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.45 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZZ and SOXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer