PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZZ vs. NASDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AMZZ vs. NASDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF (AMZZ) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AMZZ vs. NASDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZZ achieves a -20.31% return, which is significantly lower than NASDX's -6.04% return.


AMZZ

1D
2.47%
1M
0.80%
YTD
-20.31%
6M
-16.41%
1Y
-1.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NASDX

1D
3.39%
1M
-5.03%
YTD
-6.04%
6M
-4.08%
1Y
22.65%
3Y*
25.90%
5Y*
14.78%
10Y*
19.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AMZZ vs. NASDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZZ has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than NASDX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AMZZ vs. NASDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZZ
AMZZ Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
AMZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

NASDX
NASDX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
NASDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NASDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
NASDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
NASDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
NASDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZZ vs. NASDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF (AMZZ) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMZZNASDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.02

1.04

-1.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.48

1.63

-1.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.23

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.01

1.87

-1.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.03

7.07

-7.04

AMZZ vs. NASDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the NASDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZZ and NASDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMZZNASDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

1.04

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

0.29

-0.29

Correlation

The correlation between AMZZ and NASDX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

AMZZ vs. NASDX - Dividend Comparison

AMZZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NASDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMZZ
GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
3.80%3.76%16.95%7.61%3.75%2.59%1.28%7.09%2.47%1.65%0.75%0.85%

Drawdowns

AMZZ vs. NASDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZZ drawdown since its inception was -55.28%, smaller than the maximum NASDX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZZ and NASDX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZZNASDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.28%

-83.16%

+27.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.97%

-12.70%

-29.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.70%

-8.91%

-30.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.90%

-34.59%

+13.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.60%

3.37%

+15.23%

Volatility

AMZZ vs. NASDX - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF (AMZZ) has a higher volatility of 18.44% compared to Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) at 6.54%. This indicates that AMZZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NASDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AMZZNASDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.44%

6.54%

+11.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.78%

12.89%

+31.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.48%

22.75%

+46.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.21%

23.07%

+40.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.21%

22.63%

+40.58%