AMZW vs. WNTR

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

AMZW (Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AMZW returned 6.63% vs 97.02% for WNTR. At a correlation of -0.28, they often move in opposite directions. AMZW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

AMZW vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZW achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 10.46% return.

AMZW

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -14.89%
• YTD: -0.73%
• 6M: -1.71%
• 1Y: 6.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WNTR

• 1D: 6.01%
• 1M: 37.47%
• YTD: 10.46%
• 6M: 14.06%
• 1Y: 97.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZW vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF	-0.73%	7.33%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	10.46%	79.56%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZW and WNTR is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	-0.28

Return for Risk

AMZW vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZW

AMZW Risk / Return Rank: 12
AMZW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
AMZW Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
AMZW Omega Ratio Rank: 12
AMZW Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
AMZW Martin Ratio Rank: 11

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 51
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 52
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZW vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMZW	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.18	1.85	-1.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.52	2.20	-1.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.30	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.25	2.29	-2.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.56	5.85	-5.29

AMZW vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZW Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZW and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMZW vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZW drawdown since its inception was -26.79%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZW and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMZW	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.79%	-42.65%	+15.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.79%	-42.65%	+15.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.25%	-9.88%	-8.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.19%	-20.93%	+11.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.87%	16.70%	-4.83%

Volatility

AMZW vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) is 12.09%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 17.54%. This indicates that AMZW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMZW	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.09%	17.54%	-5.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.19%	45.99%	-19.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.44%	52.83%	-15.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.27%	53.10%	-15.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.27%	53.10%	-15.83%

AMZW vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMZW vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

AMZW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.16%, less than WNTR's 96.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF	49.16%	25.29%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	96.66%	58.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMZW and WNTR in my portfolio?

AMZW and WNTR have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMZW or WNTR?

WNTR has higher volatility (17.54%) compared to AMZW (12.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZW dropped -26.79% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, AMZW or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 97.02% vs 6.63% for AMZW. On fees, AMZW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, AMZW has been the lower-risk option at 12.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMZW or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 97.02% return vs 6.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMZW or WNTR?

AMZW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMZW or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 96.66%, compared with 49.16% for AMZW.

What is the main difference between AMZW and WNTR?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZW and 1.01% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.