AMZW vs. WNTR

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

AMZW (Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AMZW returned 27.02% vs 100.15% for WNTR. Their -0.28 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. AMZW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

AMZW vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZW achieves a 18.32% return, which is significantly higher than WNTR's 6.73% return.

AMZW

• 1D: -1.74%
• 1M: 13.55%
• 6M: 17.47%
• YTD: 18.32%
• 1Y: 27.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 23.54%

WNTR

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: 5.18%
• 6M: -1.23%
• YTD: 6.73%
• 1Y: 100.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 43.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF	$934.74K	$647.40K	$754.53K
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF	$4.24M	$3.75M	$3.99M

AMZW vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF	18.32%	7.33%
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF	6.73%	79.56%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZW and WNTR is -0.31, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	-0.28

Return for Risk

AMZW vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AMZW

AMZW Risk / Return Rank: 27
AMZW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
AMZW Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
AMZW Omega Ratio Rank: 28
AMZW Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
AMZW Martin Ratio Rank: 25

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 58
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 58
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AMZW vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMZW	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.65	1.85	-1.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.29	2.18	-0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.29	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.01	2.36	-1.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.12	5.96	-3.84

AMZW vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZW Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZW and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMZW vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZW drawdown since its inception was -26.79%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZW and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMZW	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.79%	-42.65%	+15.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.79%	-42.65%	+15.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.54%	-12.93%	+8.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.66%	-20.10%	+10.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.78%	16.86%	-4.08%

Volatility

AMZW vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) has a higher volatility of 20.55% compared to YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) at 12.79%. This indicates that AMZW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMZW	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.55%	12.79%	+7.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.23%	46.85%	-14.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.80%	54.57%	-12.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.16%	53.24%	-12.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.16%	53.24%	-12.08%

AMZW vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMZW vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

AMZW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 40.03%, less than WNTR's 111.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF	40.03%	25.29%
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF	111.06%	58.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMZW and WNTR in my portfolio?

AMZW and WNTR have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMZW or WNTR?

AMZW has higher volatility (20.55%) compared to WNTR (12.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZW dropped -26.79% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, AMZW or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 100.15% vs 27.02% for AMZW. On fees, AMZW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, WNTR has been the lower-risk option at 12.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMZW or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 100.15% return vs 27.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMZW or WNTR?

AMZW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMZW or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 111.06%, compared with 40.03% for AMZW.

What is the main difference between AMZW and WNTR?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZW and 1.00% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.