AMZW vs. METW
AMZW (Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF) and METW (Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while METW is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Ball Metaverse Index. AMZW is actively managed, while METW is passively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMZW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for METW.
Performance
AMZW vs. METW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZW achieves a 7.52% return, which is significantly higher than METW's -8.79% return.
AMZW
- 1D
- -3.13%
- 1M
- -10.10%
- YTD
- 7.52%
- 6M
- 6.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METW
- 1D
- 5.19%
- 1M
- 2.24%
- YTD
- -8.79%
- 6M
- -5.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZW vs. METW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF | 7.52% | 7.33% |
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF | -8.79% | -8.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZW and METW is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | 0.51 |
AMZW vs. METW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMZW
METW
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
AMZW
METW
-
Basic Materials
AMZW
-
METW
-
Communication Services
AMZW
-
METW
Consumer Defensive
AMZW
-
METW
-
Energy
AMZW
-
METW
-
Financial Services
AMZW
-
METW
-
Healthcare
AMZW
-
METW
-
Industrials
AMZW
-
METW
-
Real Estate
AMZW
-
METW
-
Technology
AMZW
-
METW
-
Utilities
AMZW
-
METW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZW vs. METW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMZW | METW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | -0.40 | +0.84 |
Drawdowns
AMZW vs. METW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZW drawdown since its inception was -26.79%, smaller than the maximum METW drawdown of -40.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZW and METW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZW | METW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.79% | -40.52% | +13.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.45% | -27.63% | +16.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.89% | -17.31% | +8.42% |
Volatility
AMZW vs. METW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZW | METW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.99% | 42.57% | -5.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.99% | 42.57% | -5.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.99% | 42.57% | -5.58% |
AMZW vs. METW - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than METW's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZW vs. METW - Dividend Comparison
AMZW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.04%, less than METW's 55.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF | 43.04% | 25.29% |
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF | 55.37% | 30.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZW and METW have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, METW is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
METW is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMZW.
METW has the higher dividend yield at 55.37%, compared with 43.04% for AMZW.
AMZW is categorized as Derivative Income, while METW is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZW and 0.59% for METW.
Find the right allocation for AMZW and METW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer