AMZW vs. MAGS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AMZW (Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF) and MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMZW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for MAGS.

Performance

AMZW vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZW achieves a 7.52% return, which is significantly higher than MAGS's 3.73% return.

AMZW

• 1D: -3.13%
• 1M: -10.10%
• YTD: 7.52%
• 6M: 6.32%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MAGS

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: 2.17%
• YTD: 3.73%
• 6M: 3.62%
• 1Y: 31.34%
• 3Y*: 33.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZW vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF	7.52%	7.33%
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	3.73%	25.24%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZW and MAGS is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025	0.66

AMZW vs. MAGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AMZW	MAGS
Consumer Cyclical	24.9%	10.5%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	9.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	15.3%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AMZW vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGS

MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 39
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 40
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZW vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMZW	MAGS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.57	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	1.55	-1.11

Drawdowns

AMZW vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZW drawdown since its inception was -26.79%, smaller than the maximum MAGS drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZW and MAGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMZW	MAGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.79%	-29.91%	+3.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-18.62%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.45%	-3.55%	-7.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.89%	-4.70%	-4.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.37%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AMZW	MAGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.80%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.31%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.99%	20.08%	+16.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.99%	25.94%	+11.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.99%	25.94%	+11.05%

AMZW vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMZW vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison

AMZW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.04%, more than MAGS's 1.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF	43.04%	25.29%	0.00%	0.00%
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	1.43%	1.48%	0.81%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMZW and MAGS in my portfolio?

AMZW and MAGS have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AMZW or MAGS?

On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMZW or MAGS?

MAGS is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMZW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMZW or MAGS?

AMZW has the higher dividend yield at 43.04%, compared with 1.43% for MAGS.

What is the main difference between AMZW and MAGS?

AMZW is categorized as Derivative Income, while MAGS is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZW and 0.29% for MAGS.