AMZW vs. IBIC
AMZW (Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. AMZW is actively managed, while IBIC is passively managed. Over the past year, AMZW returned 13.96% vs 4.32% for IBIC. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. AMZW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.
Performance
AMZW vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZW achieves a 4.20% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.33% return.
AMZW
- 1D
- 3.06%
- 1M
- -11.47%
- YTD
- 4.20%
- 6M
- 6.06%
- 1Y
- 13.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIC
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- 2.33%
- 6M
- 2.45%
- 1Y
- 4.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZW vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF | 4.20% | 7.33% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.33% | 2.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZW and IBIC is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025 | -0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZW vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank
AMZW
IBIC
AMZW vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMZW | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -8.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 2.23 | -1.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | 16.64 | -16.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.01 | 59.19 | -58.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMZW vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZW drawdown since its inception was -26.79%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZW and IBIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZW | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.79% | -0.90% | -25.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.79% | -0.27% | -26.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.19% | -0.17% | -14.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.08% | -0.10% | -8.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.70% | 0.08% | +11.62% |
Volatility
AMZW vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) has a higher volatility of 11.54% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.22%. This indicates that AMZW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZW | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.54% | 0.22% | +11.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.75% | 0.67% | +25.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.07% | 0.89% | +36.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.07% | 1.57% | +35.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.07% | 1.57% | +35.50% |
AMZW vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZW vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison
AMZW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.05%, more than IBIC's 3.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF | 46.05% | 25.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 3.59% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZW and IBIC have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMZW has higher volatility (11.54%) compared to IBIC (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZW dropped -26.79% vs IBIC's -0.90%.
On 1-year performance, AMZW leads with 13.96% vs 4.32% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AMZW has performed better with a 13.96% return vs 4.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMZW.
AMZW has the higher dividend yield at 46.05%, compared with 3.59% for IBIC.
AMZW is categorized as Derivative Income, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZW and 0.10% for IBIC.
IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.99 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZW and IBIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer